Hello all,
Recent versions of Firefox, IE, and Chrome will now cache HTTP 301 and
302 responses based on the cache control headers, (roughly) in line
with the HTTP spec. This is, in general, a good thing, but can cause
some issues, as I've discussed here: http://rwec.co.uk/q/cached-redirs
When
A more advanced version would be to allow custom HTTP headers using an
[HH=Foo:Bar] syntax or similar, but this may be going a bit far.
Does env=xxx in the Header directive then R=...,E= in RewriteRule work?
On 23/10/2011 20:54, Eric Covener wrote:
A more advanced version would be to allow custom HTTP headers using an
[HH=Foo:Bar] syntax or similar, but this may be going a bit far.
Does env=xxx in the Header directive then R=...,E= in RewriteRule work?
Hi Eric,
I haven't got a test environment
On Monday 17 October 2011, Eric Covener wrote:
I'm thinking of tweaking mod_lua to allow most LuaHook* to run
early' or late.
Currently they all run APR_HOOK_MIDDLE which can be kind of
limiting.
Would it be acceptable to just register three hooks for each phase
(early/middle/late) and
On Oct 23, 2011, at 3:19 PM, s...@apache.org wrote:
else if (r-content_type) {
const char **type = provider-types;
AP_DEBUG_ASSERT(type != NULL);
while (*type) {
-if (strcmp(*type, r-content_type) == 0) {
+/* Handle
On Oct 23, 2011, at 3:09 PM, s...@apache.org wrote:
--- httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/core.xml (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/core.xml Sun Oct 23 22:09:34 2011
@@ -1165,6 +1165,7 @@ in case of an error/description
ErrorDocument 404 /cgi-bin/bad_urls.plbr /
