On 14 Dec 2011, at 10:29 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>> Very interesting, sounds generally useful to developers, and rounds out that
>> large gap in modules/test/ that we essentially offer very little for
>> 'testing'
>> in terms of functional test modules.
>
> To clarify, I'm +1 for directly
On 12/13/2011 12:39 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 12/13/2011 10:22 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
>> - mod_policy: "HTTP protocol police"
>>
>> mod_policy is a set of httpd filters that detect and implement a set of HTTP
>> protocol checks, the idea being you declare a policy for your development
- Original Message -
> I haven't had time to study this idea in detail, but it does sound
> much
> more like a subproject, as opposed to incorporating as a module.
>
> I'm not very clear how this differs in approach from mod_pagespeed,
> and
> how the two could be leveraged together.
>
F
On 12/14/2011 6:09 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> Let's talk about the specifics of carrying this out... the
> main issues is how we tag and roll this. Recall that we don't
> have any "real" concept of Release Candidates.
I like it that way, and see no reason to change, especially not now
that we a
I haven't had time to study this idea in detail, but it does sound much
more like a subproject, as opposed to incorporating as a module.
I'm not very clear how this differs in approach from mod_pagespeed, and
how the two could be leveraged together.
This will be done tomorrow: Thurs 12/15.
On Dec 11, 2011, at 9:01 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Now that apu-1.4.1 is close to release, it looks like we are
> close to being able to have our 1st RC for 2.4.0...
>
> My plan is to T&R sometime this week...
>
Am 14.12.2011 13:09, schrieb Jim Jagielski:
Okey dokey...
Let's talk about the specifics of carrying this out... the
main issues is how we tag and roll this. Recall that we don't
have any "real" concept of Release Candidates.
maybe time to add one? ;-)
I'm assuming we can simply tag as 2.4.0-
+1!
On Dec 13, 2011, at 1:27 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As with mod_firehose and mod_policy, I have concluded negotiation with the
> BBC to open source some httpd modules that I wrote under the AL, and the BBC
> have very kindly agreed to donate the code to the ASF[1], which I beli
Okey dokey...
Let's talk about the specifics of carrying this out... the
main issues is how we tag and roll this. Recall that we don't
have any "real" concept of Release Candidates.
I'm assuming we can simply tag as 2.4.0-RC1 but what about
the MMN and the below:
#define AP_SERVER_MAJORVERSION
+1!
On Dec 13, 2011, at 10:19 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have concluded negotiation with the BBC to open source some httpd modules
> that I wrote under the AL, and the BBC have very kindly agreed to donate the
> code to the ASF[1], which I believe would fit well as subprojects of
+1!
On Dec 13, 2011, at 11:22 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As with mod_firehose, I have concluded negotiation with the BBC to open
> source some httpd modules that I wrote under the AL, and the BBC have very
> kindly agreed to donate the code to the ASF[1], which I believe would fit
Looks like a very interesting module!
i'd love to see this adapted.
~Jorge
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 7:27 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As with mod_firehose and mod_policy, I have concluded negotiation with the
> BBC to open source some httpd modules that I wrote under the AL, and the
12 matches
Mail list logo
