Re: Announcement 2.4.1

2012-03-08 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 3/8/2012 11:47 PM, Gregg Smith wrote: > On 3/8/2012 12:27 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: >> I hadn't worked out yet the right >> approach to the windows .mak files, what with the separation of httpd and >> its dependencies. Let me spend my weekend messing with the details. > Hasn't this already

Re: Announcement 2.4.1

2012-03-08 Thread Gregg Smith
On 3/8/2012 12:27 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: I hadn't worked out yet the right approach to the windows .mak files, what with the separation of httpd and its dependencies. Let me spend my weekend messing with the details. Hasn't this already been done? Or, am I missing something? Granted I h

Re: SVN question (Was: Re: log-message-tags)

2012-03-08 Thread Graham Leggett
On 07 Mar 2012, at 3:16 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Sure... just let me know what to do... For docs, you just do this: svn checkout https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/docs-build/trunk docs/manual/build Regards, Graham --

apache 2.2 can't keep up with apache 1.3

2012-03-08 Thread William Taylor
We have written a modules for apache that for certain reasons requires one hit per child. On apache 1.3 this worked fine with a minor tweak to SCOREBOARD_MAINTENANCE_INTERVAL setting it to 1 from 100. Note that this behavior can be tested without our module by setting "MaxRequestsPerChild

Re: Announcement 2.4.1

2012-03-08 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 3/8/2012 6:29 AM, Steffen wrote: > I am not aware of current versions of the dependencies that have issues: > apr-1.4.6-P1 > apr-util-1.4.1 apr-iconv-1.2.1 pcre-8.21 lua-5.1 libxml2-2.7.8 openssl-1.0.0g > zlib-1.2.6. > In fact, it works like a charm. Nor am I (aware of issues), however expat

ap_runtime_dir_relative() and 2.4.2…

2012-03-08 Thread Jim Jagielski
I'd like to see if we could get ap_runtime_dir_relative() into 2.4 in time for the release. Right now, trunk includes that func and slotmem utilizes it, and trunk passes tests with DefaultRuntimeDir set to both an abs and relative value. If people can confirm that would be great... I can start th

Re: [PATCH] DefaultRuntimeDir, ap_runtime_dir_relative()

2012-03-08 Thread Jim Jagielski
Hmmm... I'm wondering why don't we do (in server/conf.c): AP_DECLARE_DATA const char *ap_server_root = HTTPD_ROOT; AP_DECLARE_DATA const char *ap_runtime_dir = DEFAULT_REL_RUNTIMEDIR; Seems silly that we have never set these to the defaults... This might be what's hitting you... On Mar 7, 2

Re: Announcement 2.4.1

2012-03-08 Thread Mario Brandt
Hi Bing, On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 15:56, Bing Swen wrote: >There will ben Windows source files for us to test. The source files are the same. Just the line endings are different. With the lineends.pl you can change that easily srclib\apr\build\lineends.pl Cheers Mario

RE: Announcement 2.4.1

2012-03-08 Thread Bing Swen
Steffen [mailto:i...@apachelounge.com] wrote on 2012年3月8日 20:29 In the httpd 2.4.1 announcement: .There is not yet a Windows binary distribution of httpd 2.4, but this is expected to be remedied soon as various dependencies graduate from beta to GA.

Announcement 2.4.1

2012-03-08 Thread Steffen
In the httpd 2.4.1 announcement: .There is not yet a Windows binary distribution of httpd 2.4, but this is expected to be remedied soon as various dependencies graduate from beta to GA. Users reading this as that 2.4.1 is not working at all on Windows, and holding even to try it. btw, I

Re: [PATCH] DefaultRuntimeDir, ap_runtime_dir_relative()

2012-03-08 Thread Jim Jagielski
Not sure how this changes things with the current impl... Certainly collisions are possible using ServerRoot or the modules which use DEFAULT_REL_RUNTIMEDIR already, right? But yeah, I agree that noting this in the declaration comments makes sense. On Mar 7, 2012, at 3:33 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: