+1
Chris.
--
GPG Key ID: 088335A9
GPG Key Fingerprint: 86CD 3297 7493 75BC F820 6715 F54F E648 0883 35A9
Yeppers... see 2.4.2 :)
On Apr 18, 2012, at 10:28 AM, Zisis Lianas wrote:
> Hi Jim (et all),
>
> did you get any other feedback on the slotmem (directory) override?
>
> Writing all the slotmem-shm files (for mod_proxy_balancer) in the
> logs directory looks quite "unlovely", e.g. in my configur
Hi Henrik,
Am 18.04.2012 09:55, schrieb Henrik Strand:
I've just added a patch for
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51257
Does my company need to sign some kind of legal contract in order for
you to use the patch?
I dont think so since the patch is small.
However I'm not fine
Hi Jim (et all),
did you get any other feedback on the slotmem (directory) override?
Writing all the slotmem-shm files (for mod_proxy_balancer) in the
logs directory looks quite "unlovely", e.g. in my configuration with
two balancer and shared logs directory:
# ls -F1 logs/
error/
access/
slotme
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 11:48:03PM -0500, William Rowe wrote:
> Odd... there is no language assurance that these statics remain static
> across module reloads. A static var != static fn.
I don't know what you mean here, sorry. static/extern for global
variables does have basically the same sema
On 16.04.2012 16:47, Michael Weiser wrote:
> So implementation-wise this will most likely have two parts of code:
>
> 1. Determining the hostname to put into SNI data depending on
> ProxyPreserveHost somewhere in the reverse proxy module.
>
> 2. Putting that value into the SNI data in mod_ssl's
Hi,
I've just added a patch for
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51257
Does my company need to sign some kind of legal contract in order for
you to use the patch?
Kind Regards,
Henrik
