Greetings,
The CHANGES file does not describe the date of each release in its
content. (example : http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/CHANGES_2.4 )
Currently, it seems to me the way to find out when httpd-2.4.X was
released is to look for "last modified" date of files at
http://archive.apache.org/di
On 19 Jul 2012, at 11:57 AM, Vincent Deffontaines wrote:
> The CHANGES file does not describe the date of each release in its
> content. (example : http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/CHANGES_2.4 )
>
> Currently, it seems to me the way to find out when httpd-2.4.X was
> released is to look for "last
On 19/07/2012 12:01, Graham Leggett wrote:
> On 19 Jul 2012, at 11:57 AM, Vincent Deffontaines wrote:
>
>> The CHANGES file does not describe the date of each release in its
>> content. (example : http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/CHANGES_2.4 )
>>
>> Currently, it seems to me the way to find out wh
Hi,
I've asked previously on this list about inclusion of mpm-itk
(http://mpm-itk.sesse.net/) into upstream Apache; previously, the requests
have died down, mostly over discussions on security (mpm-itk does
configuration and request parsing as uid 0, although with very limited
capabilities) and ar
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Steinar H. Gunderson
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've asked previously on this list about inclusion of mpm-itk
> (http://mpm-itk.sesse.net/) into upstream Apache; previously, the requests
> have died down, mostly over discussions on security (mpm-itk does
> configuration and
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 11:27:04AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> What changes are needed to httpd trunk so that you can build mpm-itk
> with apxs and enable it via LoadModule, such that mpm-itk is fully
> functional? As I'm sure you're aware, prefork, worker, and event are
> all untied from core en
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 17:38:31 +0200
"Steinar H. Gunderson" wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 11:27:04AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> > What changes are needed to httpd trunk so that you can build mpm-itk
> > with apxs and enable it via LoadModule, such that mpm-itk is fully
> > functional? As I'm
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Steinar H. Gunderson
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 11:27:04AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>> What changes are needed to httpd trunk so that you can build mpm-itk
>> with apxs and enable it via LoadModule, such that mpm-itk is fully
>> functional? As I'm sure yo
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/server/util_script.c
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/server/util_script.c?rev=1362538&r1=1362537&r2=1362538&view=diff
==
--- httpd/httpd/trunk/server/u
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Chris Darroch wrote:
> Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
>>> Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/server/util_script.c
>>> URL:
>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/server/util_script.c?rev=1362538&r1=1362537&r2=1362538&view=diff
>>>
>>> =
On 19 Jul 2012, at 17:26, Nick Kew wrote:
>> 2. Fixes to get Apache to drop the connection if it detects (during
>> .htaccess lookup) that it would need to change the uid.
>
> Dropping the connection gratuitously breaks HTTP, and so has no place in
> httpd (of course, a third-party module sets
On 19 Jul 2012, at 18:07, Tim Bannister wrote:
> On 19 Jul 2012, at 17:26, Nick Kew wrote:
>
>>> 2. Fixes to get Apache to drop the connection if it detects (during
>>> .htaccess lookup) that it would need to change the uid.
>>
>> Dropping the connection gratuitously breaks HTTP, and so has no
On 19 Jul 2012, at 18:22, Graham Leggett wrote:
> I would hate to have to troubleshoot this - two completely independent
> behaviors, with the same symptom but completely different cause.
>
> Nick is right, a 500 is the right thing to do here.
I'm really not convinced. I'd expect a user agent t
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 5:31 PM, wrote:
> Author: trawick
> Date: Thu Jul 19 21:31:52 2012
> New Revision: 1363557
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1363557&view=rev
> Log:
> mpm_event, mpm_worker: Remain active amidst prevalent child process
> resource shortages.
>
> This is a somewhat d
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 16:41:51 -0400
Joshua Marantz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is anyone maintaining apr_memcache? Or should I stick with libmemcached?
>
> This page: http://code.google.com/p/memcached/wiki/Clients suggests
> apr_memcached is not maintained.
Huh? It's not maintained at google code since
Please download, test, and report back on this Apache-Test 1.38
release candidate.
http://people.apache.org/~phred/Apache-Test-1.38-rc1.tar.gz
MD5 (Apache-Test-1.38-rc1.tar.gz) = 6fdf8e7221f3c46e68a3e9ab3595505c
=item 1.38-rc1
Remove use of Nullsv as per modperl commit 1362399. [Steve Hay]
have
16 matches
Mail list logo