Hi Jim,
On 08.02.2012 17:01, j...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Wed Feb 8 16:01:34 2012
New Revision: 1241953
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1241953view=rev
Log:
remove -deps info from INSTALL
Modified:
httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/INSTALL
Modified:
On 19.07.2012 23:31, traw...@apache.org wrote:
Author: trawick
Date: Thu Jul 19 21:31:52 2012
New Revision: 1363557
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1363557view=rev
Log:
mpm_event, mpm_worker: Remain active amidst prevalent child process
resource shortages.
This is a somewhat different
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 9:48 AM, rj...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Sun Jul 22 13:48:30 2012
New Revision: 1364302
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1364302view=rev
Log:
Add mergeinfo for backports done by jim in r1200981.
Is there a quick guide (like a couple of sentences ;)
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 19.07.2012 23:31, traw...@apache.org wrote:
Author: trawick
Date: Thu Jul 19 21:31:52 2012
New Revision: 1363557
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1363557view=rev
Log:
mpm_event, mpm_worker: Remain active
On 22.07.2012 16:14, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 9:48 AM, rj...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Sun Jul 22 13:48:30 2012
New Revision: 1364302
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1364302view=rev
Log:
Add mergeinfo for backports done by jim in r1200981.
Is there a
CAUTION:
Always merge into a clean branch checkout and commit the whole branch. If
you start to only commit parts of the branch after merging, svn will produce
additional mergeinfo properties attached to sub directories or files. We
don't want that.
I might be a culprit here, I use
On 22.07.2012 16:59, Eric Covener wrote:
CAUTION:
Always merge into a clean branch checkout and commit the whole branch. If
you start to only commit parts of the branch after merging, svn will produce
additional mergeinfo properties attached to sub directories or files. We
don't want that.
I
On Thursday 19 July 2012, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 19 Jul 2012, at 18:07, Tim Bannister is...@jellybaby.net wrote:
On 19 Jul 2012, at 17:26, Nick Kew wrote:
2. Fixes to get Apache to drop the connection if it detects
(during .htaccess lookup) that it would need to change the
uid.
On Friday 20 July 2012, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 01:48:33PM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Why would you keep mpm-itk separate but mod_privileges not?
On reason may be that (at least in theory), mod_privileges is more
secure: Under Solaris you cannot get uid 0 unless
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 09:57:18PM +0200, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On reason may be that (at least in theory), mod_privileges is more
secure: Under Solaris you cannot get uid 0 unless you already have all
privileges, so an exploited httpd with mod_privileges does not give
you root. Under Linux
On Sunday 22 July 2012, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 09:57:18PM +0200, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On reason may be that (at least in theory), mod_privileges is
more secure: Under Solaris you cannot get uid 0 unless you
already have all privileges, so an exploited httpd
11 matches
Mail list logo
