Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.3 as GA

2012-08-19 Thread Rainer Jung
On 17.08.2012 19:34, Jim Jagielski wrote: The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.3 can be found at the usual place: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.3 GA. NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included here *only* to make lif

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.3 as GA

2012-08-19 Thread Mario Brandt
+1 on debian 6 and Windows Thanx for the Win SSL Fix Am Sonntag, 19. August 2012 schrieb Jim Jagielski : > +1 on: fed16, OSX 10.8.0, FreeBSD 8.3 > > On Aug 17, 2012, at 1:34 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.3 can be found > > at the usual place: >

Re: svn commit: r1374640 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS

2012-08-19 Thread Kaspar Brand
On 19.8.12 19:59, Kaspar Brand wrote: > Ok, thanks for clarifying, I stand corrected. opensslconf.h is included > in ssl_private.h via #include , that's why the > current 2.2.x code is working as expected. Um, for 2.2.x that should read: in ssl_toolkit_compat.h, and it's actually included through

Re: svn commit: r1374640 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS

2012-08-19 Thread Kaspar Brand
On 19.8.12 19:37, Dr Stephen Henson wrote: > On 19/08/2012 18:22, Kaspar Brand wrote: >> (ssl.h is not customized by OpenSSL's Configure script, AFAICT you would >> have to call "openssl version -f" and look for any flags set at compile >> time.) >> >> I.e., unless mod_ssl is explicitly compiled wi

Re: svn commit: r1374640 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS

2012-08-19 Thread Dr Stephen Henson
On 19/08/2012 18:22, Kaspar Brand wrote: > On 18.8.12 21:51, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: >>> to drop the #ifndef around SSL_PROTOCOL_SSLV2 in ssl_private.h, >>> this should also make some of the other "#if[n]def >>> OPENSSL_NO_SSL2" >>> encapsulations unnecess

Re: svn commit: r1374640 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS

2012-08-19 Thread Kaspar Brand
On 18.8.12 21:51, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: >> to drop the #ifndef around SSL_PROTOCOL_SSLV2 in ssl_private.h, >> this should also make some of the other "#if[n]def >> OPENSSL_NO_SSL2" >> encapsulations unnecessary. >> + [wrowe] agreed the patch

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.3 as GA

2012-08-19 Thread Jim Jagielski
+1 on: fed16, OSX 10.8.0, FreeBSD 8.3 On Aug 17, 2012, at 1:34 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.3 can be found > at the usual place: > > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.3 GA. > NO

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.3 as GA

2012-08-19 Thread Jess Holle
On 8/18/2012 8:39 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: On Aug 17, 2012, at 11:01 PM, Jess Holle wrote:\ "Downstream customers" in my case means customers that will deploy Apache and our products on their own servers. In a great many cases these servers run Windows. Ahh. That explains it. The Windows MP

Re: undesired modules loading

2012-08-19 Thread Stefan Fritsch
On Sunday 19 August 2012, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > > Partial answer: the current semantics of maintainer-mode is (per > > configure help): > > > > "Turn on debugging and compile time warnings and load all > > compiled modules" > > Umm, WTF? Why? One reason was to make it easier for httpd develo

Re: undesired modules loading

2012-08-19 Thread Rainer Jung
On 19.08.2012 00:20, Roy T. Fielding wrote: On Aug 18, 2012, at 1:45 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: Yes, before 2.4.0 we introduced exactly this difference. All modules that were build get a LoadModule line in the installed config, but most are commented out. I don't have the list of modles active by