Re: "Powered by" icon for httpd-2.4 needs update

2012-10-03 Thread Rainer Jung
On 04.10.2012 05:15, Eric Covener wrote: http://people.apache.org/~gsmith/httpd/apache_pb2copy.png http://www.humbedooh.com/apache/apache_pb.png http://www.humbedooh.com/apache/apache_pb2.png http://www.humbedooh.com/apache/apache_pb3.png pb3 has my vote Same here and thanks for the effort.

Re: "Powered by" icon for httpd-2.4 needs update

2012-10-03 Thread Jan Kaluža
On 10/04/2012 05:15 AM, Eric Covener wrote: http://people.apache.org/~gsmith/httpd/apache_pb2copy.png http://www.humbedooh.com/apache/apache_pb.png http://www.humbedooh.com/apache/apache_pb2.png http://www.humbedooh.com/apache/apache_pb3.png pb3 has my vote I like pb3 too.

Re: "Powered by" icon for httpd-2.4 needs update

2012-10-03 Thread Eric Covener
> http://people.apache.org/~gsmith/httpd/apache_pb2copy.png > http://www.humbedooh.com/apache/apache_pb.png > http://www.humbedooh.com/apache/apache_pb2.png > http://www.humbedooh.com/apache/apache_pb3.png pb3 has my vote

Re: "Powered by" icon for httpd-2.4 needs update

2012-10-03 Thread Daniel Gruno
On 10/04/2012 04:45 AM, Guenter Knauf wrote: > Am 04.10.2012 04:26, schrieb Gregg Smith: >> On 10/3/2012 6:49 PM, Jie Gao wrote: >>> What about "Apache HTTPD"? >> +1 >> >> httpd != Apache , but this is still part of the (Apache)SF last I looked. >> Maybe write over the bottom-right of Apache the HT

Re: "Powered by" icon for httpd-2.4 needs update

2012-10-03 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 04.10.2012 04:26, schrieb Gregg Smith: On 10/3/2012 6:49 PM, Jie Gao wrote: What about "Apache HTTPD"? +1 httpd != Apache , but this is still part of the (Apache)SF last I looked. Maybe write over the bottom-right of Apache the HTTPD justified right. Like so maybe? HTTPD is syncopate too ht

Re: "Powered by" icon for httpd-2.4 needs update

2012-10-03 Thread Gregg Smith
On 10/3/2012 6:49 PM, Jie Gao wrote: What about "Apache HTTPD"? +1 httpd != Apache , but this is still part of the (Apache)SF last I looked. Maybe write over the bottom-right of Apache the HTTPD justified right. Like so maybe? HTTPD is syncopate too http://people.apache.org/~gsmith/httpd/apach

Re: "Powered by" icon for httpd-2.4 needs update

2012-10-03 Thread Jie Gao
What about "Apache HTTPD"? * Guenter Knauf wrote: > Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 03:35:56 +0200 > From: Guenter Knauf > To: dev@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: "Powered by" icon for httpd-2.4 needs update > User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.9.2.28) > Gecko/20120306 Lightni

Re: "Powered by" icon for httpd-2.4 needs update

2012-10-03 Thread Daniel Gruno
On 10/04/2012 03:35 AM, Guenter Knauf wrote: > Hi Daniel, > Am 03.10.2012 22:25, schrieb Guenter Knauf: >> Am 02.10.2012 15:58, schrieb Daniel Gruno: >>> I can do a 260x30, I hope that's close enough :) >>> >>> If there are no objections, I'll create the various png/gif versions and >>> commit them

Re: "Powered by" icon for httpd-2.4 needs update

2012-10-03 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi Daniel, Am 03.10.2012 22:25, schrieb Guenter Knauf: Am 02.10.2012 15:58, schrieb Daniel Gruno: I can do a 260x30, I hope that's close enough :) If there are no objections, I'll create the various png/gif versions and commit them to trunk later today. go ahead - thats overdue! may I ask for

Re: "Powered by" icon for httpd-2.4 needs update

2012-10-03 Thread Gregg Smith
On 10/3/2012 1:31 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote: Am 03.10.2012 22:25, schrieb Guenter Knauf: Am 02.10.2012 15:58, schrieb Daniel Gruno: I can do a 260x30, I hope that's close enough :) If there are no objections, I'll create the various png/gif versions and commit them to trunk later today. go ah

Re: "Powered by" icon for httpd-2.4 needs update

2012-10-03 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 03.10.2012 22:25, schrieb Guenter Knauf: Am 02.10.2012 15:58, schrieb Daniel Gruno: I can do a 260x30, I hope that's close enough :) If there are no objections, I'll create the various png/gif versions and commit them to trunk later today. go ahead - thats overdue! oh, I should read all ma

Re: "Powered by" icon for httpd-2.4 needs update

2012-10-03 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 02.10.2012 15:58, schrieb Daniel Gruno: I can do a 260x30, I hope that's close enough :) If there are no objections, I'll create the various png/gif versions and commit them to trunk later today. go ahead - thats overdue! Gün.

Re: svn commit: r1393564 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/server/mpm/event/event.c

2012-10-03 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Graham Leggett wrote: > On 03 Oct 2012, at 5:49 PM, minf...@apache.org wrote: > >> Author: minfrin >> Date: Wed Oct 3 15:49:17 2012 >> New Revision: 1393564 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1393564&view=rev >> Log: >> Fix spelling mistakes. > > I unders

Re: [PATCH] mod_systemd

2012-10-03 Thread Issac Goldstand
+1 on concept, but Im on vacation so cant actually review the code Sent with AquaMail for Android http://www.aqua-mail.com On October 3, 2012 12:51:56 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: +1 On Oct 3, 2012, at 4:28 AM, Joe Orton wrote: > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 11:10:07AM -0400, Jan Kaluza wrote: >> a

Re: [PATCH] mod_systemd

2012-10-03 Thread Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman
NICE On Oct 3, 2012 5:28 AM, "Joe Orton" wrote: > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 11:10:07AM -0400, Jan Kaluza wrote: > > attached patch adds new module called mod_systemd. Systemd [1] is > > service manager for Linux. Although httpd works with systemd normally, > > systemd provides sd_notify(...) funct

Re: [PATCH] mod_systemd

2012-10-03 Thread Jim Jagielski
+1 On Oct 3, 2012, at 4:28 AM, Joe Orton wrote: > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 11:10:07AM -0400, Jan Kaluza wrote: >> attached patch adds new module called mod_systemd. Systemd [1] is >> service manager for Linux. Although httpd works with systemd normally, >> systemd provides sd_notify(...) functi

Re: "Powered by" icon for httpd-2.4 needs update

2012-10-03 Thread Daniel Gruno
On 10/03/2012 08:20 AM, Jan Kaluža wrote: > > Really thank for that. I see the images are already in trunk, would it > be possible to have them also in 2.4 branch? > > Thanks, > Jan Kaluza > Even though this is under the jurisdiction of the docs project, it is still commit-then-review, which is

Re: [PATCH] mod_systemd

2012-10-03 Thread Graham Leggett
On 03 Oct 2012, at 10:28 AM, Joe Orton wrote: > Any objections from the list to adding this? systemd integration is a > nice feature. Very much so, +1. Regards, Graham -- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: [PATCH] mod_systemd

2012-10-03 Thread Joe Orton
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 11:10:07AM -0400, Jan Kaluza wrote: > attached patch adds new module called mod_systemd. Systemd [1] is > service manager for Linux. Although httpd works with systemd normally, > systemd provides sd_notify(...) function [2] to inform service manager > about current status

Re: [PATCH] More useful data in ap_sload_t

2012-10-03 Thread Joe Orton
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 10:46:04AM -0400, Jan Kaluza wrote: > attached patch adds more variables (bytes_served and access_count) > into ap_sload_t struct introduced in revision 1389481. > > The intention is to have standard method to get number of total > bytes_served and access_count without co