On 01/21/2013 07:32 AM, 松本 亮介 wrote:
> Hi Daniel.
>
> Thank you for your comment.
>
>> I have tried to compile and install mod_mruby on my own machine to test
>> it, but there are too many compiler errors for it to work :( In
>> particular, you have a lot of declarations after statements in your
hi!
Has anyone tried to build 2.4.3 with vc11?
Using either makefiles or dsp (converted), I got a rc.exe error,
"invalid usage". The cmd line is:
rc.exe /d "NDEBUG" /d "APP_FILE" /d "BIN_NAME="httpd.exe"" /d
"LONG_NAME="Apache HTTP Server"" /d "ICON_FILE="apache.ico"" /d
"_VC80_UPGRADE=0x0600" /
On 2013/01/21, at 19:03, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> On 01/21/2013 07:32 AM, 松本 亮介 wrote:
>> Hi Daniel.
>>
>> Thank you for your comment.
>>
>>> I have tried to compile and install mod_mruby on my own machine to test
>>> it, but there are too many compiler errors for it to work :( In
>>> particular,
Hi Daniel,
I tested benchmark of mod_mruby.
test case are:
- test case 1 mod_mruby inline code into https.conf
mod_mruby need not fopen()
- test case 2 run mod_mruby scripts file per requests
mod_mruby need fopen() and fclose() per requests
- test environment
OS: Linux version 2.6.18-
On 01/21/2013 01:59 PM, 松本 亮介 wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> I tested benchmark of mod_mruby.
>
> test case are:
My main concern here is; is it thread-safe (or even thread-aware)?
Most people will be using 2.4 with the event MPM, which is threaded, not
the prefork MPM. I have no problems doing concurr
On 2013/01/21, at 22:03, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> On 01/21/2013 01:59 PM, 松本 亮介 wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> I tested benchmark of mod_mruby.
>>
>> test case are:
>
> My main concern here is; is it thread-safe (or even thread-aware)?
> Most people will be using 2.4 with the event MPM, which is thr
On Jan 20, 2013, at 5:45 AM, Fabien wrote:
>
> Hello devs,
>
> I've been given the go to add mod_macro to httpd trunk, see r1435811.
>
> The module is in modules/core. There are English and French documentations
> and extensive non regression tests. The module is compiled in with "most". It
On Jan 20, 2013, at 3:56 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
> On 1/17/2013 6:52 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> *ping* :)
>>
>> (yeah, I am kinda pushing/hoping for the balancer
>> stuff to be in 2.4.4 in time for ACNA13)
>
>
> BalancerPersist:
> Tested fine and works as expected (+1)
> Side note A lo
On 1/21/2013 8:26 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Disabling BalancerInherit is only needed when using the
> Balancer Manager and only if there are conflicts between
> a Balancer in the top-level server and a vhost. With BI On,
> if a balancer is defined at the top level, then vhosts A
> and B get their
On 1/21/2013 8:59 AM, j...@apache.org wrote:
> druggeri: (Discussion started on dev@ list)
> * This can not be fully verified until bug 52402 is fixed
> + jim: 52402 is fixed and is part of the backport for
> persist below
> * This doesn't see
On 1/21/2013 12:27 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
> Argh - saw this after the dev@ reply. Will mess with both patches
> together and report back. For now ignore my previous message :-)
Aye - that did it! Sorry for the noise - was testing the two patches
independently.
--
Daniel Ruggeri
On 2013/01/21, at 22:17, MATSUMOTO Ryosuke wrote:
> On 2013/01/21, at 22:03, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>
>> On 01/21/2013 01:59 PM, 松本 亮介 wrote:
>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>
>>> I tested benchmark of mod_mruby.
>>>
>>> test case are:
>>
>> My main concern here is; is it thread-safe (or even thread-aware)?
On 21.01.2013 15:26, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Disabling BalancerInherit is only needed when using the
> Balancer Manager and only if there are conflicts between
> a Balancer in the top-level server and a vhost. With BI On,
> if a balancer is defined at the top level, then vhosts A
> and B get their o
No worries! Thx for the review!
On Jan 21, 2013, at 1:35 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
> On 1/21/2013 12:27 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
>> Argh - saw this after the dev@ reply. Will mess with both patches
>> together and report back. For now ignore my previous message :-)
>
> Aye - that did it! Sorry
14 matches
Mail list logo
