Re: [VOTE] Release mod_fcgid 2.3.8

2013-09-30 Thread Steffen
Running at AL now 2.3.7 again, all fine again with 1-3 processes instead of the 30+ with 2.3.8. The config live running here and your config for synthetic test is different. And not using fat php processes and max processes is in place. Not any mod_fcgid directives here in a vhost, only i

Re: [VOTE] Release mod_fcgid 2.3.8

2013-09-30 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 5:23 AM, Steffen wrote: > > Running at AL now 2.3.7 again, all fine again with 1-3 processes instead > of the 30+ with 2.3.8. > > The config live running here and your config for synthetic test is > different. And not using fat php processes and max processes is in place.

Re: Add skiplist to APR 1.5 (Was: Re: event MPM (Was: Re: Planning for 2.4.7 in Oct))

2013-09-30 Thread Jim Jagielski
+1... On Sep 28, 2013, at 12:12 PM, Graham Leggett wrote: > >> On 26 Sep 2013, at 15:44, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> Like I said, I think that skiplist fits better in APR; in >> fact there are a few other things in httpd that would be >> "better" in APR, but APR and httpd are 2 sep projects an

Re: [VOTE] Release mod_fcgid 2.3.8

2013-09-30 Thread Steffen
Still not going well with patch restore-fcgid-2.3.7-process-count-r1.txt See for details http://www.apachelounge.com/status.html I notice: - just one process is serving. - rest is just “hanging” as working with no accesses and high idle time. Back to 2.3.7 From: Jeff Trawick Sent: Monday,

Re: Streamlining/improving ephemeral key handling in mod_ssl?

2013-09-30 Thread Kaspar Brand
On 29.09.2013 19:48, Hanno Böck wrote: > What needs to happen so this can be backported to 2.4? Testing patches and reporting on its results e.g. (as previously solicited in this thread). I have put a backport of the relevant trunk commits under https://people.apache.org/~kbrand/mod_ssl-2.4.x-ekh

Re: [VOTE] Release mod_fcgid 2.3.8

2013-09-30 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Steffen wrote: > Still not going well with patch restore-fcgid-2.3.7-process-**count-r1.txt > > See for details > http://www.apachelounge.com/**status.html > > I notice: > > - just one process is serving. > - rest is just

Re: [PATCH 55593] Add "SSLServerInfoFile" directive

2013-09-30 Thread Trevor Perrin
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 1:06 AM, Kaspar Brand wrote: > On 28.09.2013 18:34, Dr Stephen Henson wrote: >> How about something like: >> >> int SSL_CONF_cmd_type(SSL_CONF_CTX *cctx, const char *cmd); >> >> which can return things like... >> >> SSL_CONF_TYPE_INVALID:unrecognised name. >> SSL_CO