Running in real at AL for an hour with patch revert-r1377398.txt
Results, see www.apachelounge.com/status-revert-r1377398.html
Observation:
No hanging with working and no accesses anymore
Still quite some more processes: with 2.3.7 1-3 and now 8
Processes with idle time more then 300
Having a look at MPM event's doc (
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/mod/event.html#asyncrequestworkerfactor),
I found this :
[...] if all workers are busy, [mpm_event] will close connections in
keep-alive state even if the keep-alive timeout has not expired
.
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 2:33
Hi Yann,
Am 01.10.2013 17:08, schrieb Yann Ylavic:
As far as I understand the issue, the main point of prefetch was to fix
CVE-2005-2088, a HTTP Request Smuggling attack (see also
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2005-2088).
This is discussed in PR40029 and is
There are a few proposed backports in 2.4 STATUS that could
use some votes and some luv...
Be a Goat; Test and Vote.
Hi Micha,
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Micha Lenk mi...@lenk.info wrote:
Independent from how the HRS issue (CVE-2005-2088) was fixed at that
time, I still believe that it is a bad idea in terms of security to
flush the buffer and forward its content to the backend before the
*whole*
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 3:15 AM, Dr Stephen Henson
shen...@opensslfoundation.com wrote:
OpenSSL has the concept of the current certificate. That is the last
certificate set. So you set certificate foo and then any parameters you
set
are associated with it until another certificate is set.
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 5:45 AM, Steffen i...@apachelounge.com wrote:
Running in real at AL for an hour with patch revert-r1377398.txt
Results, see www.apachelounge.com/status-revert-r1377398.html
Observation:
No hanging with working and no accesses anymore
Still quite some more
