On 26 Dec 2013, at 21:47, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> As part of the dicsussion, it's become clear that some of the keys in
> https://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/KEYS are weak by any modern
> consideration of public key cryptography. Could this set of keys be
> pruned?
You're ahead of us. Indiv
Hi apache folks--
In http://bugs.debian.org/732450, debian is preparing to
cryptographically verify OpenPGP signatures on apache upstream tarballs.
As part of the dicsussion, it's become clear that some of the keys in
https://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/KEYS are weak by any modern
consideration of
Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>
>>
>> Kaspar Brand wrote:
>>> On 21.12.2013 14:21, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> I guess a more general fix for this would be:
No further comments / feedback? If not then I would commit the patch.
>>>
>>> The
On 26 Dec 2013, at 10:13, Nick Gearls wrote:
> Why not using the standard regex syntax:
> foo|bar)/baz/(?.*)">
Is it supported by our current API?
Regards,
Graham
--
Why not using the standard regex syntax:
foo|bar)/baz/(?.*)">
On 26-12-2013 08:43, Graham Leggett wrote:
Hi all,
It seems it is currently not possible to make reference to backreferences in
regexes:
Something ${1}
One of the tricky things to overcome to make this possible is that multi
