Re: Looking to T&R 2.4.8 in Feb...

2014-01-06 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Jan 6, 2014, at 2:40 PM, Blaise Tarr wrote: > > So mod_rewrite is not recognizing the "unix:" prefix as being valid. I > temporarily commented out the call of fully_qualify_uri(r) at > mod_rewrite.c:4130, and now r->filename is set correctly: > Yes, right now the UDS support is only valid d

Re: Looking to T&R 2.4.8 in Feb...

2014-01-06 Thread Blaise Tarr
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > > One more vote for the UDS patch would be appreciated if anyone could > spare a moment to have a look. Happy New Year all, BTW. I tried the UDS patch in httpd trunk with mod_proxy_fcgi and PHP-FPM, and ProxyPass is working nicely now. I use

Re: Looking to T&R 2.4.8 in Feb...

2014-01-06 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 1/6/2014 11:58 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > nuff said :) One more vote for the UDS patch would be appreciated if anyone could spare a moment to have a look. Happy New Year all, BTW. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Looking to T&R 2.4.8 in Feb...

2014-01-06 Thread Jim Jagielski
nuff said :)

Re: svn commit: r1555920 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

2014-01-06 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 6:04 PM, wrote: > Author: jim > Date: Mon Jan 6 17:04:32 2014 > New Revision: 1555920 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1555920 > Log: > event fdq fix proposal. > > Modified: > httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS > > Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS > URL: > htt

Re: Event and atomics, round II

2014-01-06 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Now that 2.4.7 has been out for awhile, I would have assumed > that if people were hitting the "atomics not working as > expected" error (using unsigned as signed), we would have > started hearing about it... But, afaik, we haven't. > Since