Hello ,
I have mod_ftp configured in my apache server.
Whenever I want to store/put a file to a directory, I have to do cd to the dir
and put/store the file after connecting through ftp.
Some of the devices are just configured to run store command but upload
fails,as cd has to be issued and
On Feb 24, 2014, at 10:05 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> I use the following config :
>
>
> ServerName localhost:60080
>
> RewriteEngine on
> RewriteRule "^/(.*)$" "unix:/tmp/backend.sock|http://localhost/$1"; [P,NE]
>
>http://localhost"; disablereuse=off>
>
>
>
Why the co
Thanks very much, Jeff!
Thanks,
Lucy
From: Jeff Trawick [mailto:traw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 10:36 AM
To: Apache HTTP Server Development List
Subject: Re: FW: [PATCH ASF bugzilla# 55897]prefork_mpm patch with SO_REUSEPORT
support
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Lu, Yingqi
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Lu, Yingqi wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>>
>>
>> I just want to ping again on this patch to gather your feedback and
>> comments. Please refer to the messages below for patch details.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Yin
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Lu, Yingqi wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> I just want to ping again on this patch to gather your feedback and
> comments. Please refer to the messages below for patch details.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Yingqi
>
Hi Yinqqi,
I'm sorry that nobody has responded yet. I'll try
Hi All,
I just want to ping again on this patch to gather your feedback and comments.
Please refer to the messages below for patch details.
Thanks,
Yingqi
From: Lu, Yingqi
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 11:13 AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH ASF bugzilla# 55897]prefork_mpm patch
I see, makes sense.
Thanks, I'll think about it if/when we agree on a commit.
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 6:19 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>>
>>> This could be a worthwhile idea and I have seen your patch in bugzilla.
>>> For ease of comment
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>
>> This could be a worthwhile idea and I have seen your patch in bugzilla.
>> For ease of commenting I would like you to post it here such that inline
>> comments could
>> be made (I would have some).
>
> Here it is (thanks for looking into
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
> Yann Ylavic wrote:
> > There seem to be different questions in this thread regarding SNI.
> > Maybe we can enumerate them first to see what's going on (at least I need
> > to)
> >
> > 1. What should the client-provided SNI be checked aga
Rich pinged me from an airport.
We had a cancellation for one of the httpd talks for Denver, any
proposals to fill the slot that either didn't make the first cut or
didn't get submitted at all?
An alternative option might be an ask / stump the experts or open
discussion thing, since we do have 2
On 2/24/2014 1:23 PM, Anthony Pankov wrote:
It is very interesting. Especially if it is possible to associate
FastCgi servers(socket) with apache handlers and then use handlers where
needed as SetHandler/AddHandler.
Yes you can indeed do that.
Also i'm glad to hear that mod_ext
>>https://github.com/hollow/mod_fastcgi_handler
Yes, this kind of configuration is what i want.
I think this link usefull for Kean Johnston, who is gathering to
please us with mod_extfcgi.
> https://github.com/hollow/mod_fastcgi_handler is quite easy to
> configure, unfortunetly it is ab
What sort of problem? I cannot recreate any...
Why doesn't the magic in ap_proxy_pre_request() looking
for "rewrite-proxy" happen? It should. In any case, I
think if there's a bug, then it's because mod_rewrite
isn't setting that note when needed. Doesn't that
make sense?
On Feb 21, 2014, at 8:56
https://github.com/hollow/mod_fastcgi_handler is quite easy to
configure, unfortunetly it is abandoned
2014-02-21 17:56 GMT+01:00 Антон Панков :
> Dear All.
>
> Please, explain what functionality now in trunk and what plans for
> mod_fcgid. I miss FastCGIExternalServer feature.
>
> The probl
It is very interesting. Especially if it is possible to associate
FastCgi servers(socket) with apache handlers and then use handlers where
needed as SetHandler/AddHandler.
Also i'm glad to hear that mod_extfcgi will not cross mod_fcgid
functionality.
I can try it on development
Yann Ylavic wrote:
> There seem to be different questions in this thread regarding SNI.
> Maybe we can enumerate them first to see what's going on (at least I need to)
>
> 1. What should the client-provided SNI be checked against?
> 1.1. for server or proxy-reverse
> 1.2. for proxy-forward/CONNE
16 matches
Mail list logo
