Hi,
Further to my previous mail, I have generated apr rpm build and
successfully installed after installing the dependency packages (autoconf,
libtool, doxygen).
After this I tried installing apr-util 1.5.3 version and it has the
following dependencies,
[root@localhost apr-util]# rpmbuild -ba ap
On 3 Mar 2014, at 08:05, Venkatesh Prabu Narayanan
wrote:
> Further to my previous mail, I have generated apr rpm build and successfully
> installed after installing the dependency packages (autoconf, libtool,
> doxygen).
>
> After this I tried installing apr-util 1.5.3 version and it has the
@Graham,
Most of these dependencies are not available for RHEL 4 via yum and that is
why I have commented it out.
Meanwhile I get apr-util to work with this below package even after
commenting out the devel dependencies from cent OS,
http://vault.centos.org/6.5/os/Source/SPackages/apr-util-1.3.9
Am 03.03.2014 09:05, schrieb Venkatesh Prabu Narayanan:
> Further to my previous mail, I have generated apr rpm build and successfully
> installed after installing the
> dependency packages (autoconf, libtool, doxygen).
>
> After this I tried installing apr-util 1.5.3 version and it has the fol
Am 03.03.2014 11:07, schrieb Venkatesh Prabu Narayanan:
> @Graham,
>
> Most of these dependencies are not available for RHEL 4 via yum
why do you waste others time not stating at the begin
that you are use a unsupported and outdated OS?
you can't have recent software on such a system
so please
On 3 Mar 2014, at 10:07, Venkatesh Prabu Narayanan
wrote:
> Most of these dependencies are not available for RHEL 4 via yum and that is
> why I have commented it out.
If you comment out a dependency, you need to comment out the parameter to
./configure that enables that dependency, and then
@Reindl,
>>> why do you waste others time not stating at the begin
that you are use a unsupported and outdated OS?
>>> you can't have recent software on such a system
so please stop waste others time especially on devel-lists
>>> End of Production 3 (End of Production Phase)
February 29, 2012
I
I try to get
1
2 ProxyPass "http://backend/?*[]/";
3 ProxyPassReverse "http://backend/?*[]/";
4
to work and get the error message
AH00526: Syntax error on line 2 of ...:
Regular expression could not be compiled.
I guess that "/?*[]/" is a valid location, right? So it should work,
Anyone else willing/able to cast some STATUS votes?
On Feb 4, 2014, at 8:58 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I'd like to T&R and release 2.4.8 this month... Let's all take
> some time to:
>
> 1. See what in trunk should really be backported
> 2. Test and vote in STATUS backports
>
> Let's get peop
From what I can see, it's pretty useful and I'm not detecting
any errors or issues which would cause a regression. Final
testing will be done by COB today but I expect to fold it
into trunk, while adding some doc info.
On Feb 27, 2014, at 12:19 PM, ryo takatsuki wrote:
>> Thx for the patch! Let
i would happily build a RPM for our devel-machines
still missing a RC tarball :-(
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Am 03.03.2014 15:04, schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Anyone else willing/able to cast some STATUS votes?
>
> On Feb 4, 2014, at 8:58 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> I'd like to T&R and re
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Anyone else willing/able to cast some STATUS votes?
>>
> i would happily build a RPM for our devel-machines
> still missing a RC tarball :-(
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Jim is referring to votes in the STATUS file for backports to
DirectoryCheckHandler has got my vote/promotion.
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Anyone else willing/able to cast some STATUS votes?
>
> On Feb 4, 2014, at 8:58 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> > I'd like to T&R and release 2.4.8 this month... Let's all take
> > some time to:
Tom,
this code is shared with all the other pipe features in httpd, I
believe the docs at
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/logs.html#piped will explain why
the shell was
not invoked, and provides an example of how to invoke your pipe script
with shell.
You can use the docs commentary system t
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:38 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> Tom,
>
> this code is shared with all the other pipe features in httpd, I
> believe the docs at
> http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/logs.html#piped will explain why
> the shell was
> not invoked, and provides an example of how to inv
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Tom Browder wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:38 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>> Tom,
>>
>> this code is shared with all the other pipe features in httpd, I
I've tried each of these versions to no avail:
SSLPassPhraseDialog |/path/to/passphrase.sh
S
Am 03.03.2014 15:44, schrieb Eric Covener:
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> Anyone else willing/able to cast some STATUS votes?
>>>
>> i would happily build a RPM for our devel-machines
>> still missing a RC tarball :-(
>>
>> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> Jim i
Anyone know how to have the test framework run a script before
it starts the tests, then stop the script when the tests
are done?
I wanted to add some UDS tests to the framework but can't for
the life of me figure out how to do the above...
Note the -start and -stop functionality of the framework. Is this
script supposed to live for the duration of a test? Or will this
script coexist next to the running server? The server can be started
and left there, ready for multiple test invocations even across
machines, so it would be helpful
19 matches
Mail list logo
