I'm sure we can do w/ mod_rewrite... it's just that
it's soo expensive :)
On May 30, 2014, at 3:40 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>
> Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Off the top of my head, I think we would need to
>> add another proxypass option.
>
> Have you tried the following?
>
> RewriteEngine On
Sorry I didn't catch this earlier:
I see
+++ httpd-trunk.new/include/mpm_common.h2014-05-16 13:07:03.892987491
-0400
@@ -267,16 +267,18 @@
* Write data to the pipe-of-death, signalling that one child process
* should die.
* @param pod the pipe-of-death to write to.
+ * @param my_bu
I also see:
/* kill off the idle ones */
-ap_mpm_pod_killpg(pod, retained->max_daemons_limit);
+for (i = 0; i < num_buckets; i++) {
+ap_mpm_pod_killpg(pod[i], i, retained->max_daemons_limit);
+}
Is that right? Why isn't it: ap_mpm_pod_killpg(pod,
ret
Hi Jim,
Thanks very much for your email! I will look into both of them and send an
update tonight!
Thanks,
Yingqi
> On May 31, 2014, at 9:43 AM, "Jim Jagielski" wrote:
>
> I also see:
>
> /* kill off the idle ones */
> -ap_mpm_pod_killpg(pod, retained->max_daemons_limit);
> +
There is also the same kind of code in apr/misc/unix/rand.c.
In this case, the +1 is missing.
I think that line 157 of 'rand.c' should be changed in:
egd_path_len = strlen(*egdsockname) + 1;
in order to take into account the '\0' that is expedted at the end of
sun_path.
CJ
Le 31/05/2
Hi Jim,
Regarding to your comment #2, yes, you are right, it should be
ap_mpm_pod_killpg(pod, retained->max_daemons_limit, i). Thanks very much for
catching this.
Regarding to your comment #1, the patch modifies the dummy_connection(ap_pod_t
*pod) to be dummy_connection(ap_pod_t *pod, int chil
Fix in r1598946.
CJ
