On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 5:01 PM, wrote:
> I presume the 3 +1's were sufficient? There was some discussion
> around the change hitting 2.2 before 2.4, so I wanted to be sure we
> had the right patch on the actively maintained release branch, at
> least in svn.
No issues, I just misremembered the
- Original Message - Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release 2.2.28 as GA?
From: wr...@rowe-clan.net
Date: 8/26/14 4:07 pm
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Glad to see the testing efforts, it looks like this is going to fly.
Jumped over from *nix-ish platforms back into Windows for a while,
so I'll m
Glad to see the testing efforts, it looks like this is going to fly.
Jumped over from *nix-ish platforms back into Windows for a while,
so I'll make sure the -win32-src.zip is collected with a successful
binary build against openssl 1.0.1i this aftn/eve, and sum the votes
provided there is no sur
- Original Message - Subject: Re: Test failure on 2.4-HEAD
From: "Jim Jagielski"
Date: 8/26/14 11:20 am
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
On Aug 26, 2014, at 11:02 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
> I recognize it, it's what you get if you built the (proposed only?)
> trailers thing
Looks li
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Looks like its been folded into 2.4-branch...
>
> Sorry you are right. I will fix the TC
r1620663.
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Looks like its been folded into 2.4-branch...
Sorry you are right. I will fix the TC
--
Eric Covener
cove...@gmail.com
On Aug 26, 2014, at 11:02 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
> I recognize it, it's what you get if you built the (proposed only?)
> trailers thing
Looks like its been folded into 2.4-branch...
Am 26.08.2014 um 17:02 schrieb Eric Covener:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Anyone else seeing this with HEAD of 2.4?
# testing : trailer (pid)
# expected: '67568'
# received: 'No chunked trailer available!'
not ok 3
# Failed test 3 in t/apache/chunkinput.t at line 71
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Anyone else seeing this with HEAD of 2.4?
>
> # testing : trailer (pid)
> # expected: '67568'
> # received: 'No chunked trailer available!'
> not ok 3
> # Failed test 3 in t/apache/chunkinput.t at line 71
I recognize it, it's what you get
Anyone else seeing this with HEAD of 2.4?
# testing : trailer (pid)
# expected: '67568'
# received: 'No chunked trailer available!'
not ok 3
# Failed test 3 in t/apache/chunkinput.t at line 71
On 08/19/2014 12:39 PM, Jan Kaluža wrote:
@@ -3206,6 +3277,10 @@ static int event_pre_config(apr_pool_t *
"atomics not working as expected - add32 of
negative number");
return HTTP_INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR;
}
+retained->idle_spawn_rate = apr_pa
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> I am looking at this PR which I was able to recreate:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56729
Whoops, I got the topic backwards. Fast post, slow response.
--
Eric Covener
cove...@gmail.com
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 10:05 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> But it seemed a little hokey, but I didn't really understand if we
> could instead treat that speculative read as some kind of reset point
> and couldn't think of any other hook to tell reqtimeout to bail out.
>
> Any alternatives?
I don't t
13 matches
Mail list logo
