Re: C99 bump prior to apr 2.0?

2014-09-03 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
And to answer the question, VC6 for httpd 2.2 is simply for msvcrt.DLL compatibility and no-surprises upgrades. It is suboptimal, but not as suboptimal as MS's active disdain for msvcr###.dll users. "Wang, Andy" wrote: >On Wed, 2014-09-03 at 09:27 -0700, wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote: >> Finally

Re: C99 bump prior to apr 2.0?

2014-09-03 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
The 1.5 apr-util (and apr) branches are actively maintained. You have forward binary compatibility since 1.0 used in the early 2.1-dev days. Because 1.4.x was not receiving attention (and was missing new API's used for httpd-2.4) the project determined it would bundle 1.5 rather than the now-s

Re: C99 bump prior to apr 2.0?

2014-09-03 Thread Wang, Andy
On Wed, 2014-09-03 at 09:27 -0700, wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote: > Finally returned to VC6, having replaced my older svn on Windows > which would no longer handshake with svn.apache.org and bumped into > a single issue. > > Building VC6 binaries for win32, I was bitten by r1508904 which > introduces

Re: C99 bump prior to apr 2.0?

2014-09-03 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi Bill, On 03.09.2014 18:27, wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote: In terms of providing dist/httpd/binaries/win32 httpd 2.2.29 based on msvcrt,dll, I have a couple of options; [x] Ship with r1563992 applied (and document this? where?) [ ] Drop apr_dbd_odbc.dll from the distribution [ ] Don't ship a

Re: C99 bump prior to apr 2.0?

2014-09-03 Thread Gregg Smith
That pesky intptr_t, On 9/3/2014 9:27 AM, wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote In terms of providing dist/httpd/binaries/win32 httpd 2.2.29 based on msvcrt,dll, I have a couple of options; [+1] Ship with r1563992 applied (and document this? where?) [ +/-0] Drop apr_dbd_odbc.dll from the distribution [ -

C99 bump prior to apr 2.0?

2014-09-03 Thread wrowe
Finally returned to VC6, having replaced my older svn on Windows which would no longer handshake with svn.apache.org and bumped into a single issue. Building VC6 binaries for win32, I was bitten by r1508904 which introduces a C99 type prior to releasing apr 2.0 (probably not a good idea to make s

Missing invocation of vulnerabilites_22.sh for cms site staging

2014-09-03 Thread wrowe
If someone is more familiar with the site cms build than I am... lib/path.pm seems to glob the vulnerabilities_22.sh and vulnerabilities_24.sh as dependencies of content/security/vulnerabilities-httpd.xml. However, according to the last builds only vulnerabilities_24.sh is being invoked; http: