FWIW, there is potentially another issue for mod_wsgi coming up as well.
Seems that I was using an APR function which was tagged as internal and in
trunk of APR the header file that function is defined in is no longer
installed, or at least when within srclib of httpd, thus mod_wsgi will no
longer
Okay, I screwed up that analysis a bit. It is APR 1.X to 2.X which is the
issue and I can fix by having:
#if APR_MAJOR_VERSION 2
#include apr_support.h
#endif
The specific code was:
#if APR_MAJOR_VERSION 2
rv = apr_wait_for_io_or_timeout(NULL, sock, 0);
#else
rv =
mod_ftpd too I believe
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Martynas Bendorius
marty...@martynas.it wrote:
And what about https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37564 ? :)
Not likely for the release on the horizon. A few people would need to
deep-dive into suexec to be able to change it responsibly.
Here is a good example thread :
http://grokbase.com/t/apache/modules-dev/11bp9bhxr5/basic-example-shared-memory-code
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Joe Lewis jle...@silverhawk.net wrote:
It is definitely possible to share information - see the apr_shm_*
functions (or check the history on
Hi Jim,
Thanks for your email. I think it should not be very hard to back port. After
you trunked the original patch last June, I was working with Yann Ylavic last
November to fix some minor issues. With current trunked code, there is no major
API change to 2.4 version and we have tested with
I'm trying to determine if it is plausible to build an apache module for a
web based terminal emulator. I would be borrowing some of the code from
the ShellInaBox project:
https://code.google.com/p/shellinabox/
The code uses openpty() to create a new process operating in a pseudo-tty.
The apache
One example is Google's implementation of SSH client to login into their
Google Cloud's Compute instances. It uses GA based cookies for the
authentication.
Thanks and Regards!
Vikram Tiwari https://google.com/+VikramTiwari
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 11:07 PM, Joe Lewis
It is definitely possible to share information - see the apr_shm_*
functions (or check the history on this list for shared memory). Eash POST
request is considered a separate event, and is processed as such, which
means there is no state in the protocol itself (there is when you add HTTP
headers
And what about https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37564 ? :)
Best regards,
Martynas Bendorius
On 1/9/15 4:45 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Jacob Perkins jacob.perk...@cpanel.net wrote:
Any chance we could get this back ported into 2.4 for the 2.4.11
Thanks for the heads up and I appreciate very much the steps you are taking
to limit possible affects.
What I will do is the following:
1. Verify that recompiling mod_wsgi is actually sufficient given than my
direct use of request_rec isn't going to populate the extra fields and they
will remain
That is a good example showing how to share a simple counter value between
processes. But how would you go about sharing a file descriptor between
processes within an apache module? Am I right that if you store the file
descriptor in the shared memory pool, that file descriptor value would not
Since Jim is talking 2.4.11, I should report this now. We discovered
this week in Fedora: mod_wsgi does some interesting things in daemon
mode, notably that it allocates a request_rec internally which ends up
getting used by httpd.
Reason is, the fix for CVE-2013-5704 extends the request_rec:
On 01/09/2015 09:23 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
Since Jim is talking 2.4.11, I should report this now. We discovered
this week in Fedora: mod_wsgi does some interesting things in daemon
mode, notably that it allocates a request_rec internally which ends up
getting used by httpd.
Reason is,
On 01/09/2015 09:48 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Joe Orton jor...@redhat.com
mailto:jor...@redhat.com wrote:
Since Jim is talking 2.4.11, I should report this now. We discovered
this week in Fedora: mod_wsgi does some interesting things in daemon
Sorry, this shouldn't have gone to dev@httpd.apache.org.
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Joe Orton jor...@redhat.com wrote:
Since Jim is talking 2.4.11, I should report this now. We discovered
this week in Fedora: mod_wsgi does some interesting things in daemon
mode, notably that it allocates a request_rec internally which ends up
getting used by
Hi Ewald,
zunächst mal ein gutes neues Jahr!
Am 08.01.2015 um 17:29 schrieb Ewald Dieterich:
On 01/08/2015 04:15 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
Can you test this (attached) patch please (without yours applied)?
Or with yours and just changing return
ap_map_http_request_error(status,
Hi,
Am 08.01.2015 um 12:11 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
Let's shoot for a TR next week. The work will keep me
warm :)
Can we please get another vote on this?
* core: Fix -D[efined] or Define[d] variables lifetime
accross restarts. PR 57328.
trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1643825
Thx. Will do.
On Jan 8, 2015, at 7:06 AM, olli hauer oha...@gmx.de wrote:
On 2015-01-08 12:11, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Let's shoot for a TR next week. The work will keep me
warm :)
Perhaps you can take a look into this two bug id's:
-
Let me look... how easy is the backport?
On Jan 8, 2015, at 12:22 PM, Lu, Yingqi yingqi...@intel.com wrote:
Hi All,
Can we make the SO_REUSEPORT support into this new stable version? The
first version of the patch was trunked last June. After tests and
modifications, I think it is ready
Hi,
I hope this is the right place for it:
for an upcoming customer project I need ALPN/NPN support in apache 2.4.x. There
is a (reopened) ticket with patch for this
(https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52210) that was started on
2.2.x The patch is applied with slight variation
Good morning!
Any chance we could get this back ported into 2.4 for the 2.4.11 release?
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55910
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55910
This is causing us some headaches with our mod_security rollouts.
Thanks!
—
Jacob Perkins
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Jacob Perkins jacob.perk...@cpanel.net wrote:
Any chance we could get this back ported into 2.4 for the 2.4.11 release?
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55910
This is causing us some headaches with our mod_security rollouts.
This one is
Testing this out as we speak...
On Jan 9, 2015, at 9:45 AM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Jacob Perkins jacob.perk...@cpanel.net
wrote:
Any chance we could get this back ported into 2.4 for the 2.4.11 release?
25 matches
Mail list logo
