On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 06:36:13PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
However, the actual issue here is that mod_ssl is squatting the SSL_
namespace.
Historically this may have made sense (it seems mod_ssl and OpenSSL have
shared history/authors). Bill Rowe suggested to try moving mod_ssl's
On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Stefan Sperling s...@apache.org wrote:
So to take a first step forward, here's a diff that puts ssl_util_ssl.h
macros into the MODSSL_ namespace.
+1
This moves symbols related to '2nd application data' into the ssl_ namespace.
File-level static symbols have no external linkage so don't need a namespace.
Index: modules/ssl/README.dsov.fig
===
--- modules/ssl/README.dsov.fig
+1, but why not skip right to the Upgrade: websocket check?
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote:
Follow up to [1] based on users@ experience...
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Marc Hörsken i...@marc-hoersken.de wrote:
I just figured out the configuration
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Christophe JAILLET
christophe.jail...@wanadoo.fr wrote:
So I think that the best fix would be just to remove the 2 Order...Allow...
lines from the example, just as in the other example above it.
+1
--
Eric Covener
cove...@gmail.com
Hi,
I think that http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/sitemap.html#comment_3895
is also related to this change.
CJ
Le 17/04/2015 21:46, n...@apache.org a écrit :
Author: nd
Date: Fri Apr 17 19:46:28 2015
New Revision: 1674382
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1674382
Log:
The good thing about
