I don't fully understand your report, but I see "there is no
autoindex" is bogus since this is a fixup and autoindex is a handler.
Seems like maybe it's broken multiple ways. Probably best to scrap it
(tomorrow)
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 12:38 AM, Gregg Smith wrote:
> This breaks autoindex generate
This breaks autoindex generated Indexes!
This really should be reverted and rethunk.
I have a testfile and header/readme files in all subdirectories below
/htdocs
There is an index.html file in /htdocs
I have no FallbackResource configured.
DocumentRoot /htdocs
DirectoryIndex index.html
Option
Thank you very much for your help, Yann!
All, please test the patch and vote for us if you like it :-)
Thanks,
Yingqi
-Original Message-
From: Yann Ylavic [mailto:ylavic@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2015 4:45 PM
To: httpd
Subject: Re: SO_REUSEPORT
Hi Yingqi,
2 votes already
Hi Yingqi,
2 votes already (on 3), it makes its way ;)
Regards,
Yann.
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 1:00 AM, Lu, Yingqi wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I just want to check if anyone gets chances to check the SO_REUSEPORT patch?
> Any feedback?
>
> Thanks,
> Yingqi
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Lu, Y
Hi All,
I just want to check if anyone gets chances to check the SO_REUSEPORT patch?
Any feedback?
Thanks,
Yingqi
-Original Message-
From: Lu, Yingqi [mailto:yingqi...@intel.com]
Sent: Friday, May 08, 2015 8:58 AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: SO_REUSEPORT
Hi Christophe, Jim a
Looks good to me, thanks!
I committed r1679470 in trunk and proposed a backport to 2.4.x (will
propose a v2 for my 2.2.x patch which is also concerned), since
SSL_DEFAULT_CIPHER_LIST (default when no SSL[Proxy]CipherSuite is
configured) does not include "!aNULL:!eNULL" for older OpenSSL
versions (
Proposed for backport on both 2.2 and 2.4 branches.
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 1:44 PM, wrote:
> Author: wrowe
> Date: Thu May 14 18:44:52 2015
> New Revision: 1679428
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1679428
> Log:
> Conform to RFC 7525, with additional suggestion to drop RSA Kx ciphers
>
> Modifi
