patch (mod_ssl/ab) to support OPENSSL_NO_SSL3 builds

I've opened a ticket for this already (bz 58349) but it was suggested that I send mail here as well. Currently httpd builds fail with libressl as SSLv3 has been disabled (OPENSSL_NO_SSL3); ab.c and mod_ssl unconditionally use SSLv3_method() functions. ab.c fails at build time, mod_ssl is

Re: patch (mod_ssl/ab) to support OPENSSL_NO_SSL3 builds

On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 10:37:44AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > I've opened a ticket for this already (bz 58349) but it was suggested > that I send mail here as well. > > Currently httpd builds fail with libressl as SSLv3 has been disabled > (OPENSSL_NO_SSL3); ab.c and mod_ssl unconditionally

Re: patch (mod_ssl/ab) to support OPENSSL_NO_SSL3 builds

On 2015/09/10 13:40, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 10:37:44AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > I've opened a ticket for this already (bz 58349) but it was suggested > > that I send mail here as well. > > > > Currently httpd builds fail with libressl as SSLv3 has been disabled

Re: PR 54626 - ldaps not working with microsoft ldapsdk

The patch in trunk is broken. It looks like it was applied with the 2.2.25 generated diff and patch heuristically applied On 09/08/2015 09:38 PM, Eric Covener wrote: No reason at all as far as I can tell, just overlooked. I always build with an alternate SDK on Windows -- a confirmation

Re: mod_websocket ownership (and fixes)

On 09/10/2015 02:50 PM, Alex Bligh wrote: Here: https://github.com/abligh/apache-websocket in the vncproxy directory you will find a vncproxy (which is actually a generic tcpproxy as well, though it could be hugely simplified to do that alone) which you are welcome to have if you've not changed

Re: mod_websocket ownership (and fixes)

On 10 Sep 2015, at 22:05, Jacob Champion wrote: > I've submitted a pull request to the original author, but I'm assuming he > will not suddenly appear out of the blue after three years, so I plan to > actively own and maintain my fork on GitHub. If you're also interested

nghttp2 1.3.0 Build failure on GNUC macro now fixed

FYI, nghttp2 1.3.0 build failure on a GNUC-specific macro has been replaced by more generic C in nghttp2 source and should be available in the next release. Cheers, N.

Re: PR 54626 - ldaps not working with microsoft ldapsdk

On 09/10/2015 01:50 PM, Andy Wang wrote: I'm going to try 2.2.31 now to see if I see different behavior. But other than to correct the incorrect message about SSL being unavailable, in 2.4.x the fixed version of the patch doesn't appear to functionally change anything. yup, 2.2.31 works

Re: PR 54626 - ldaps not working with microsoft ldapsdk

On 09/10/2015 02:51 PM, Eric Covener wrote: On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Andy Wang wrote: yup, 2.2.31 works perfectly fine for me as well without any additional patches. I posted a comment on the bugzilla report as well as an updated patch against 2.4.16. I don't have

Re: PR 54626 - ldaps not working with microsoft ldapsdk

On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Andy Wang wrote: > yup, 2.2.31 works perfectly fine for me as well without any additional > patches. I posted a comment on the bugzilla report as well as an updated > patch against 2.4.16. I don't have trunk sucked down in svn yet, so I > didn't

mod_websocket ownership (and fixes)

To hopefully put this thing to bed, six months later -- I have taken the mod_websocket patchset started by the long conversation in [1] and pushed it to a GitHub fork [2]. I've submitted a pull request to the original author, but I'm assuming he will not suddenly appear out of the blue after