Re: mod_proxy_hcheck review..

2016-03-20 Thread Jim Jagielski
> On Mar 19, 2016, at 5:05 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > > > Anyway, this is really cool stuff! > Thanks! It is one thing that nginx has that we don't. Of course, we also have lots of stuff that nginx doesn't but that doesn't seem to sway lots of people ;)

Re: mod_proxy_hcheck review..

2016-03-20 Thread Jim Jagielski
> On Mar 19, 2016, at 5:05 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > > > However, it seems that there are some paths where the worker threads > can allocate on (or use) the server config pool (ctx->p, a subpool of > pconf). > This (AFAICT) concerns hc_get_hcworker(), hc_determine_connection(), > hc_get_backend(

Re: mod_proxy_hcheck review..

2016-03-20 Thread Jim Jagielski
> On Mar 19, 2016, at 5:05 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > > The proposed backport patch (v2) does not contain mod_proxy_hcheck.c > itself Actually, it does: http://home.apache.org/~jim/patches/hcheck-2.4-v2.patch ... diff --git a/modules/proxy/mod_proxy_hcheck.c b/modules/proxy/mod_proxy_hcheck.c

Bug report for Apache httpd-2 [2016/03/20]

2016-03-20 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned