Re: svn commit: r1738292 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

2016-04-08 Thread Eric Covener
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 6:32 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > It was working, in the sense that it had the intended effect (the [un]define > took effect) in the broader global context. > > This is a breaking change to some potentially existing configs, however > misguided they are, which is the sort

Re: svn commit: r1738292 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

2016-04-08 Thread William A Rowe Jr
It was working, in the sense that it had the intended effect (the [un]define took effect) in the broader global context. This is a breaking change to some potentially existing configs, however misguided they are, which is the sort of thing we've avoided in the released branch. Could we log an err

Re: [RESULT] Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.20 as GA

2016-04-08 Thread Stefan Eissing
Thanks, Jim! > Am 08.04.2016 um 17:25 schrieb Jim Jagielski : > > With >= 3 +1 (binding) votes and many +1 non-binding votes, > I call this vote CLOSED with the result of the vote PASSING. > > I will start the xfer to mirrors in prep for an announcement > on Monday. > > Thx to all testers and c

Re: proxy API compat break in 2.4.7

2016-04-08 Thread Jim Jagielski
Ahh... yes, for 3rd party modules depending on mod_proxy, or using mod_proxy, they would need to be recompiled. Ideally, we should have put these at the end of the struct as we do with the more "major" structs. > On Apr 7, 2016, at 2:09 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: > > Revision 1560081 (backport of r

Re: proxy API compat break in 2.4.7

2016-04-08 Thread Jim Jagielski
> On Apr 7, 2016, at 6:55 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 8:09 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: >> Revision 1560081 (backport of r1533087) introduced "char >> uds_path[PROXY_WORKER_MAX_NAME_SIZE]" in the middle of the >> proxy_worker_shared structure which IMHO broke compatibility betwe

[RESULT] Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.20 as GA

2016-04-08 Thread Jim Jagielski
With >= 3 +1 (binding) votes and many +1 non-binding votes, I call this vote CLOSED with the result of the vote PASSING. I will start the xfer to mirrors in prep for an announcement on Monday. Thx to all testers and contributors! > On Apr 4, 2016, at 12:20 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > The pre-

Re: proxy API compat break in 2.4.7

2016-04-08 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 04/07/2016 09:36 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > The first most important documentation of this should be in ap_mmn.h, > as we've done in the past (you'll see some highlights). > > A note under the CHANGES entry for 2.4.7 seems worthwhile. > > Pointing this out under Announcement seems approp