Re: svn commit: r1745517 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/support/win32/ApacheMonitor.c

On 5/25/2016 11:14 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: Your comment doesn't match the code, and I think you have the condition inverted, _setargv() worked for decades, and only was broken in the more recent MSVC's. Typo, should be 1800 in log, I'll change it. I may revert it now that I dug & found

Re: svn commit: r1745517 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/support/win32/ApacheMonitor.c

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 1:14 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > Your comment doesn't match the code, and I think you have the condition > inverted, _setargv() worked for decades, and only was broken in the more > recent MSVC's. > Correction, the code looks right (sort of, I

Re: svn commit: r1745517 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/support/win32/ApacheMonitor.c

Your comment doesn't match the code, and I think you have the condition inverted, _setargv() worked for decades, and only was broken in the more recent MSVC's. My thought is to unilaterally change this to the unicode implementation, because 1. ANSI-only are dead Windows OS's, and 2. Getting the

Re: [POLL] Commitment to 2.2.x lifecycle? (Was: End of the road of 2.2.x maintenance?)

On 05/25/2016 05:11 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 5:07 PM, William A Rowe Jr > wrote: > > On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Gregg Smith > wrote: > > On 5/16/2016

Re: [POLL] Commitment to 2.2.x lifecycle? (Was: End of the road of 2.2.x maintenance?)

*) I intend to help maintain/test 2.2.x releases over the next 12 mos *) I intend to backport/review 2.2.x security patches over the next 12 mos

[POLL] Commitment to 2.2.x lifecycle? (Was: End of the road of 2.2.x maintenance?)

On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 5:07 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Gregg Smith wrote: > >> On 5/16/2016 11:03 AM, Eric Covener wrote: >> >>> One shortcoming of a 12 month countdown is that some folks will not be >>> able to