2016-07-01 22:31 GMT+02:00 Yann Ylavic :
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 10:17 PM, William A Rowe Jr
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Yann Ylavic
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 6:32 PM, Luca Toscano
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > "The Last-Modified header value '%s' (parsed assuming
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 10:17 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 6:32 PM, Luca Toscano
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > "The Last-Modified header value '%s' (parsed assuming the GMT timezone)
>> > has
>> > been replaced with '%s' beca
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 6:32 PM, Luca Toscano
> wrote:
> >
> > "The Last-Modified header value '%s' (parsed assuming the GMT timezone)
> has
> > been replaced with '%s' because considered in the future."
>
> Looks good to me (maybe "(GMT)" only
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 6:32 PM, Luca Toscano wrote:
>
> "The Last-Modified header value '%s' (parsed assuming the GMT timezone) has
> been replaced with '%s' because considered in the future."
Looks good to me (maybe "(GMT)" only between parentheses?).
The original log message can still be switc
Hi Yann!
2016-07-01 18:02 GMT+02:00 Yann Ylavic :
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 5:00 PM, wrote:
> > Author: elukey
> > Date: Fri Jul 1 15:00:42 2016
> > New Revision: 1750953
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1750953&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Fixed typo in log message, wrong RFC mentioned.
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 5:00 PM, wrote:
> Author: elukey
> Date: Fri Jul 1 15:00:42 2016
> New Revision: 1750953
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1750953&view=rev
> Log:
> Fixed typo in log message, wrong RFC mentioned.
>
> Modified:
> httpd/httpd/trunk/server/util_script.c
>
> Modif
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 4:05 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> Yup, no extra steps for correct behavior.
>
> I'd support a ''surpress SNI' flag, and/or an explicit SNI arg, much like
> openssl s_client -- just for testing. But that should be the exceptional
> case.
Done, so that one can also test ren
+1
o 14.04.1-Ubuntu x86_64
> Am 30.06.2016 um 19:21 schrieb Jim Jagielski :
>
> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.23 can be found
> at the usual place:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.23 GA.
>
> [ ] +1:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 12:57 PM, William A Rowe Jr
wrote:
> it looks like 2.2.32 is in a good state for tagging, [...]
>
> There are three patches looking for one more review, and once
> those three are reviewed, I expect to tag later today or early
> tomorrow morning.
>
If anyone is looking at
Yup, no extra steps for correct behavior.
I'd support a ''surpress SNI' flag, and/or an explicit SNI arg, much like
openssl s_client -- just for testing. But that should be the exceptional
case.
On Jul 1, 2016 8:33 AM, "Reindl Harald" wrote:
Am 01.07.2016 um 15:23 schrieb Yann Ylavic:
> On Fr
Am 01.07.2016 um 15:23 schrieb Yann Ylavic:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 01.07.2016 um 14:41 schrieb Yann Ylavic:
The -I does not take any argument, it tells ab to use iether the -H
"Host: ..." if any, or the h
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> Am 01.07.2016 um 14:41 schrieb Yann Ylavic:
>>>
>>> The -I does not take any argument, it tells ab to use iether the -H
>>> "Host: ..." if any, or the host from the given URL otherwise
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 01.07.2016 um 14:41 schrieb Yann Ylavic:
>>
>> The -I does not take any argument, it tells ab to use iether the -H
>> "Host: ..." if any, or the host from the given URL otherwise
>
> but why is there a param needed instead just send the S
Am 01.07.2016 um 14:41 schrieb Yann Ylavic:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Pietro Paolini wrote:
On 1 July 2016 at 11:18, Pietro Paolini wrote:
Is it correct ? It does not look good to me.
-while ((status = apr_getopt(opt,
"n:c:t:s:b:T:p:u:v:lrkVhwix:y:z:C:H:P:A:g:X:de:SqB:m:"
+
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Pietro Paolini wrote:
>
> On 1 July 2016 at 11:18, Pietro Paolini wrote:
>>
>> Is it correct ? It does not look good to me.
>>
>> -while ((status = apr_getopt(opt,
>> "n:c:t:s:b:T:p:u:v:lrkVhwix:y:z:C:H:P:A:g:X:de:SqB:m:"
>> +while ((status = apr_getopt(op
On 1 July 2016 at 11:18, Pietro Paolini wrote:
>
>
> On 30 June 2016 at 19:55, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 7:21 PM, Pietro Paolini
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > I have built the httpd-2-.4.20 tarball but the problem is still there,
>> has
>> > it been fixed in newer version ? is there
On 30 June 2016 at 19:55, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 7:21 PM, Pietro Paolini
> wrote:
> >
> > I have built the httpd-2-.4.20 tarball but the problem is still there,
> has
> > it been fixed in newer version ? is there a workaround for that ?
>
> SNI handling just added to ab in
Good to go Slackware 14.x
On 01/07/2016 04:02, Jim Jagielski wrote:
+1:
o OSX 10.11.5, Xcode 7.3.1
o CentOS 6, 64bit
o CentOS 7, 64 bit
o Ubuntu 15.10, 64 bit
On Jun 30, 2016, at 1:21 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.23 can be found
at the usual
18 matches
Mail list logo
