On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
> I was thinking of something like the attached patch, where we compute
> the exact/minimal timeout needed for the queues.
>
> It requires walking/locking the queues (looking at the first item
> only), but besides getting
On 8/19/2016 3:03 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 7:14 AM, Michael Felt wrote:
root@x064:[/data/prj/apache/httpd-2.4.23]nm /opt/modules/mod_authn_file.so |
grep apr_password_validate
Are you sure that the libapr you're scrutinizing is being loaded at
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:17 PM, William A Rowe Jr
wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 6:14 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
>>
>> How couldn't it figure out that apr_pstrcat() never returns NULL?
>> Clever compilers should really read all the docs :)
>>
>
> :)
>
On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Christophe JAILLET
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> shouldn't "queue_info->idlers" on line 138 of "mpm/worker/fdqueue.c" be read
> using "apr_atomic_read32" ?
Actually both apr_atomic_read32() and current volatile declaration are
racy here,
On 8/19/2016 3:03 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 7:14 AM, Michael Felt wrote:
root@x064:[/data/prj/apache/httpd-2.4.23]nm /opt/modules/mod_authn_file.so |
grep apr_password_validate
Are you sure that the libapr you're scrutinizing is being loaded at
Hi,
shouldn't "queue_info->idlers" on line 138 of "mpm/worker/fdqueue.c" be
read using "apr_atomic_read32" ?
CJ
---
L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a été vérifiée par le logiciel
antivirus Avast.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus