On 01/10/2017 08:35 AM, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
Before I send someone into the woods - did anyone consider/do a quick
‘mod_lets_encrypt’ (with or without a persistent store) — that
requires virtually no configuration ?
Considered? Yes. Back in August there was some discussion on this list
Before I send someone into the woods - did anyone consider/do a quick
‘mod_lets_encrypt’ (with or without a persistent store) — that requires
virtually no configuration ?
Or is the web world still thinking unix with clear small concise scripts that
do one thing well ?
Dw
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 4:59 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>
> On 12/28/2016 03:40 PM, cove...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: covener
>> Date: Wed Dec 28 14:40:54 2016
>> New Revision: 1776285
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1776285&view=rev
>> Log:
>> improve a debug message
>>
>>
>> Modi
On 12/30/2016 03:20 PM, drugg...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: druggeri
> Date: Fri Dec 30 14:20:48 2016
> New Revision: 1776575
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1776575&view=rev
> Log:
> Merge new PROXY protocol code into mod_remoteip
>
> Modified:
> httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/log-messa
On 12/28/2016 03:40 PM, cove...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: covener
> Date: Wed Dec 28 14:40:54 2016
> New Revision: 1776285
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1776285&view=rev
> Log:
> improve a debug message
>
>
> Modified:
> httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/mod_proxy_wstunnel.c
>
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 8:33 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> As this seems (once applied to 2.4) to be an accepted part of the overall
> patch,
> Yann you might want to add this to the merge/backport patch branches as part
> of our overall, recommended patches against 2.2/2.4.
Done in r1778094 (2