On 03/08/2017 02:29 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
Final call for yay/nay?
Works great on my machine, +1!
--Jacob
That was my thought as well... Thx for confirming w/o me having
to relook at the code ;)
> On Mar 8, 2017, at 11:30 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:39 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> What would prevent the create_config hook from being
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:39 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> What would prevent the create_config hook from being called
> for each Vhost?
0 directives from your mod in the config section, IIUC.
What would prevent the create_config hook from being called
for each Vhost?
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 3:30 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
>
> Simply doing:
>
> $ svn merge
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x-openssl-1.1.0-compat
>
> ... into a 2.4.x wc should DTRT, no? It seems to work fine here.
Indeed, it does, thanks.
> (I got
On Mar 8, 2017 4:29 AM, "Joe Orton" wrote:
Sorry, taking my time here, and I appreciate all the feedback.
Definitely happier to debate it and get it right than be lumbered with
annoying edge cases forever.
I did the refactoring in r1785943, so third iteration attached has
+1
> Am 08.03.2017 um 11:29 schrieb Joe Orton :
>
>
Stefan Eissing
bytes GmbH
Hafenstrasse 16
48155 Münster
www.greenbytes.de
+1
Regards
Rüdiger
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Joe Orton [mailto:jor...@redhat.com]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 8. März 2017 11:30
> An: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: [RFC] ?
>
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 11:52:17AM -0800, Jacob Champion wrote:
> > On 02/28/2017 04:32 PM, Jacob
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 11:52:17AM -0800, Jacob Champion wrote:
> On 02/28/2017 04:32 PM, Jacob Champion wrote:
> > I just don't like hamstringing a nice new directive with what's
> > effectively a (rare) bug.
>
> (The conversation kinda died shortly after I said this. That was not my
> intent --
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 12:45:54PM -0600, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> Six months ago, rjung forked 2.4.x and began to backport our
> compatibility fixes for OpenSSL 1.1.0. Today, from the state of
> trunk, it seems the compatibility efforts look very good and are
> nearly ready to apply to 2.4.x.
10 matches
Mail list logo