Re: [RFC] ?

2017-03-08 Thread Jacob Champion
On 03/08/2017 02:29 AM, Joe Orton wrote: Final call for yay/nay? Works great on my machine, +1! --Jacob

Re: create_config

2017-03-08 Thread Jim Jagielski
That was my thought as well... Thx for confirming w/o me having to relook at the code ;) > On Mar 8, 2017, at 11:30 AM, Eric Covener wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:39 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> What would prevent the create_config hook from being

Re: create_config

2017-03-08 Thread Eric Covener
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:39 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > What would prevent the create_config hook from being called > for each Vhost? 0 directives from your mod in the config section, IIUC.

create_config

2017-03-08 Thread Jim Jagielski
What would prevent the create_config hook from being called for each Vhost?

Re: Status of 2.4.x-openssl-1.1.0-compat/ ?

2017-03-08 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 3:30 AM, Joe Orton wrote: > > Simply doing: > > $ svn merge > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x-openssl-1.1.0-compat > > ... into a 2.4.x wc should DTRT, no? It seems to work fine here. Indeed, it does, thanks. > (I got

Re: [RFC] ?

2017-03-08 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Mar 8, 2017 4:29 AM, "Joe Orton" wrote: Sorry, taking my time here, and I appreciate all the feedback. Definitely happier to debate it and get it right than be lumbered with annoying edge cases forever. I did the refactoring in r1785943, so third iteration attached has

Re: [RFC] ?

2017-03-08 Thread Stefan Eissing
+1 > Am 08.03.2017 um 11:29 schrieb Joe Orton : > > Stefan Eissing bytes GmbH Hafenstrasse 16 48155 Münster www.greenbytes.de

AW: [RFC] ?

2017-03-08 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
+1 Regards Rüdiger > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Joe Orton [mailto:jor...@redhat.com] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 8. März 2017 11:30 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: Re: [RFC] ? > > On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 11:52:17AM -0800, Jacob Champion wrote: > > On 02/28/2017 04:32 PM, Jacob

Re: [RFC] ?

2017-03-08 Thread Joe Orton
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 11:52:17AM -0800, Jacob Champion wrote: > On 02/28/2017 04:32 PM, Jacob Champion wrote: > > I just don't like hamstringing a nice new directive with what's > > effectively a (rare) bug. > > (The conversation kinda died shortly after I said this. That was not my > intent --

Re: Status of 2.4.x-openssl-1.1.0-compat/ ?

2017-03-08 Thread Joe Orton
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 12:45:54PM -0600, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > Six months ago, rjung forked 2.4.x and began to backport our > compatibility fixes for OpenSSL 1.1.0. Today, from the state of > trunk, it seems the compatibility efforts look very good and are > nearly ready to apply to 2.4.x.