Does this raise concerns for anyone? I'd note than in the case of the x-font
items, we entirely skipped application/font- promotions prior to
font/* registry.
It doesn't seem sane to keep x- tags for posterity, but we might want to mention
the previous application/* types... however we have no pre
It's fair to reiterate first that most folks here don't care and "get it"...
but let me offer another perspective that folks may have to deal with. Devil's
advocate here, and all that.
1.2.4 is released. It contains security fixes
1.2.5 is burned during RM
1.2.6 is burned during RM
1.2.7 is rele
Am 29.09.2017 um 14:16 schrieb Eric Covener:
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 6:57 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 29.09.2017 um 12:35 schrieb Graham Leggett:
On 29 Sep 2017, at 12:25 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
it's not about cheap - it's just questionable that after 2.4.12 the next
release is 2.4.16
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 6:57 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 29.09.2017 um 12:35 schrieb Graham Leggett:
>>
>> On 29 Sep 2017, at 12:25 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>> it's not about cheap - it's just questionable that after 2.4.12 the next
>>> release is 2.4.16 because it looks not really sane
Am 29.09.2017 um 12:35 schrieb Graham Leggett:
On 29 Sep 2017, at 12:25 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
it's not about cheap - it's just questionable that after 2.4.12 the next
release is 2.4.16 because it looks not really sane
Looks perfectly sensible to me
in your world where you know the ba
On 29 Sep 2017, at 12:25 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> it's not about cheap - it's just questionable that after 2.4.12 the next
> release is 2.4.16 because it looks not really sane
Looks perfectly sensible to me.
Regards,
Graham
—
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Am 29.09.2017 um 12:16 schrieb Graham Leggett:
On 28 Sep 2017, at 7:10 PM, Helmut K. C. Tessarek wrote:
I have a question. Why are you tagging a release and do testing? Most of
the time a problem is found and a new release is tagged and it starts
over (I think the max was a 3 or 4 patch leve
On 28 Sep 2017, at 7:10 PM, Helmut K. C. Tessarek wrote:
> I have a question. Why are you tagging a release and do testing? Most of
> the time a problem is found and a new release is tagged and it starts
> over (I think the max was a 3 or 4 patch level jump).
>
> Why not tagging an RC? People te
