On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 8:25 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Why lump 2.5.0 into all this?
>
> There is no rational reason to force connect 2.4.29 and 2.5.0
>
> Tag 2.4.29 and leave 2.5.0 alone until people discuss it. Until then
> I will veto any foolishness about 2.5.0-whatever.
Good work, you helpe
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 12:36 AM, Marion & Christophe JAILLET <
christophe.jail...@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> just for my own curiosity: why do we prefer 32 bits libs?
>
It is not a value judgement, we simply consume lib/pkginfo before
lib64/pkginfo in this patch. We didn't even look at lib64/p
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 03:00:36PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd
> version 2.4.29 can be found at the usual place:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.29 GA.
>
> [ ] +1: Good to g
+1 (binding):
o macOS 10.12 / Xcode9
o CentOS 6, 64bit
o Ubuntu 16.04, 64bit
o Fedora 23, 64bit
> On Oct 17, 2017, at 3:00 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd
> version 2.4.29 can be found at the usual place:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/
On 18/10/2017 05:00, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd
> version 2.4.29 can be found at the usual place:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.29 GA.
>
> [ ] +1: Good to go
> [ ] +0: meh
> [ ] -1:
And a +1 report from Bernard Spil , who just built with
libressl on debian.
> Am 18.10.2017 um 11:06 schrieb Stefan Eissing :
>
>
>
>> Am 17.10.2017 um 21:00 schrieb Jim Jagielski :
>>
>> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd
>> version 2.4.29 can be found at the usual place:
>>
>>
> Am 17.10.2017 um 21:00 schrieb Jim Jagielski :
>
> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd
> version 2.4.29 can be found at the usual place:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.29 GA.
>
> [ ] +1: Good to go
> [ ] +
