Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

Am 14.03.2018 um 16:10 schrieb Joe Orton: On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 02:56:19PM +, Joe Orton wrote: This looks like the failure I see when localhost resolves to both ::1 and 127.0.0.1, which happens with modern Fedora hosts: $ grep localhost /etc/hosts 127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdoma

Re: A hang with mod_md renew

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 11:07 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > Hi Steffen, > > On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 6:55 PM, Steffen wrote: >> >> See : https://www.apachelounge.com/viewtopic.php?p=36588#36588 > > Could we have the log messages at LogLevel trace1? Also, what's the configuration for MDRenewWindow the

Re: A hang with mod_md renew

Hi Steffen, On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 6:55 PM, Steffen wrote: > > See : https://www.apachelounge.com/viewtopic.php?p=36588#36588 Could we have the log messages at LogLevel trace1? Regards, Yann.

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

Am 14.03.2018 um 19:59 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri: On 2018-03-14 09:56, Joe Orton wrote: On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 12:10:20PM +0100, Rainer Jung wrote: All 280 builds succeeded. Geez, now I feel bad just testing one build ;) Great stuff! +1! Rainer must be a machine... or, perhaps only partially.

Re: A hang with mod_md renew

An other report at www.apachelounge.com/viewtopic.php?p=36590#36590 > Op 14 mrt. 2018 om 18:55 heeft Steffen het volgende > geschreven: > > > Now it is official in httpd, I report it here and not as private mail or git. > > Reported at AL: > > > > Yesterday was the day for the Renew of

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

On 2018-03-14 09:56, Joe Orton wrote: On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 12:10:20PM +0100, Rainer Jung wrote: All 280 builds succeeded. Geez, now I feel bad just testing one build ;) Great stuff! +1! Rainer must be a machine... or, perhaps only partially... cyborg, maybe? Regardless, I always look f

A hang with mod_md renew

Now it is official in httpd, I report it here and not as private mail or git. Reported at AL: Yesterday was the day for the Renew of the test certificate and of course it did not work again. Instead, mod_watchdog hangs in an endless loops loop and writes the logfile full But looking at

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

+1! All good THX! > On Mar 9, 2018, at 9:49 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > > Hi, all; >Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > > I would like to call a VOTE over the ne

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 02:56:19PM +, Joe Orton wrote: > This looks like the failure I see when localhost resolves to both ::1 > and 127.0.0.1, which happens with modern Fedora hosts: > > $ grep localhost /etc/hosts > 127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain localhost4 localhost4.localdoma

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 12:10:20PM +0100, Rainer Jung wrote: > All 280 builds succeeded. Geez, now I feel bad just testing one build ;) Great stuff! > The following test failures were seen: > > a t/ab/base.t tests 1, 3 and 5 fail always on Linux > - # Failed test 1 in t/ab/base.t at line 29 >

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

Am 10.03.2018 um 03:49 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri: Hi, all;    Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as 2.4.32: [X] +1: It's not just good

[PATCH] Return HTTP 431 (Request Header Fields Too Large) for requests with large headers

Hi, Please find patch that changes HTTPD to return HTTP 431 (Request Header Fields Too Large) for requests with large headers. This status code is defined by RFC 6585 [1]. Currently HTTPD returns generic HTTP 400 (Bad Request) status code for requests with large headers. [1] https://tools.ietf.or

Re: Vote 2.4.32 and mod_md no valid Certificate Agreement directive

> Am 13.03.2018 um 21:43 schrieb William A Rowe Jr : > >> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 6:23 AM, Eric Covener wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 6:33 AM, Stefan Eissing >> wrote: >>> Am 12.03.2018 um 11:23 schrieb Daniel Gruno : Would it be possible to just have a link that always po