Re: Poll: increase OpenSSL version requirement for trunk?

On 18/03/2018 05:32, Nick Kew wrote: > On Fri, 16 Mar 2018 09:06:53 -0400 > Eric Covener wrote: > >> I think bump trunk now, but not rip out any compat code for ease of >> backport. > > +1. > > 2.4 is a stable branch: we can't go making changes that would > disrupt existing

[VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.33

Hi, all; Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as 2.4.33: [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. [ ] -1:

Re: [NOTICE] T of 2.4.33 imminent

Am 17.03.2018 um 20:37 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri: Hi, all; I will be doing the tag and roll of 2.4.33 very soon (2ish hours). I am on mobile so haven't reviewed STATUS since yesterday during the day - now would be a great time for votes and backports just before bundling it all up :-) In

[NOTICE] T of 2.4.33 imminent

Hi, all; I will be doing the tag and roll of 2.4.33 very soon (2ish hours). I am on mobile so haven't reviewed STATUS since yesterday during the day - now would be a great time for votes and backports just before bundling it all up :-) -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: Poll: increase OpenSSL version requirement for trunk?

On Fri, 16 Mar 2018 09:06:53 -0400 Eric Covener wrote: > I think bump trunk now, but not rip out any compat code for ease of > backport. +1. 2.4 is a stable branch: we can't go making changes that would disrupt existing users. What we could do is make it an annoying (even