> Am 06.05.2020 um 10:43 schrieb Ruediger Pluem :
>
>
>
> On 5/6/20 10:27 AM, Luca Toscano wrote:
>> Aside from the technical change (that IIUC it is really nice), I
>> really love when the code is so well documented. Having comments in
>> the code and in the commit message is great for
On 5/6/20 1:01 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 11:44:37AM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
>> On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 05:23:23PM +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>> On 5/4/20 3:49 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
d) SSLRandomSeed. This might have made sense in 1998 but at least with
OpenSSL
On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 11:44:37AM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 05:23:23PM +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> > On 5/4/20 3:49 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
> > > d) SSLRandomSeed. This might have made sense in 1998 but at least with
> > > OpenSSL 1.1.1 which has a rewritten and
On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 05:23:23PM +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> On 5/4/20 3:49 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
> > d) SSLRandomSeed. This might have made sense in 1998 but at least with
> > OpenSSL 1.1.1 which has a rewritten and fork-safe RAND, I think httpd
> > should not be doing RAND seeding ever.
On 5/6/20 10:27 AM, Luca Toscano wrote:
> Aside from the technical change (that IIUC it is really nice), I
> really love when the code is so well documented. Having comments in
> the code and in the commit message is great for whoever is in a
> similar situation like mine (namely some knowledge
Aside from the technical change (that IIUC it is really nice), I
really love when the code is so well documented. Having comments in
the code and in the commit message is great for whoever is in a
similar situation like mine (namely some knowledge of httpd internals
but still very far from
