Passed: apache/httpd#1006 (2.4.x - bcd21b2)

Build Update for apache/httpd - Build: #1006 Status: Passed Duration: 10 mins and 16 secs Commit: bcd21b2 (2.4.x) Author: Graham Leggett Message: Vote, promote. git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x@1879894

Re: svn commit: r1879591 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: configure.in server/log.c

On 15 Jul 2020, at 16:27, Joe Orton wrote: >> Looks like ac_cv_func_gettid is no but ap_cv_gettid is yes. > > This is not consistent with what you posted before. Looking again, the > old configure output you posted has: > > checking for gettid()... yes > > note the (), which is only

Re: svn commit: r1879888 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES include/ap_mmn.h modules/dav/main/mod_dav.h modules/dav/main/util.c

On 15 Jul 2020, at 15:33, Greg Stein wrote: > Seems these helper functions would be a better fit within apr_xml, rather > than httpd. In the long term, yes. In the “it must be practical to use this with v2.4” term, I’d rather continue with the established pattern, and then move the lot of

Re: svn commit: r1879591 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: configure.in server/log.c

On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 04:03:41PM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote: > On 15 Jul 2020, at 15:35, Joe Orton wrote: > > >> checking for gettid()... yes > > > > Interesting, can you provide the config.log and "rpm -q glibc"? With a > > RHEL8 vm here it does not detect gettid (as I'd expect for glibc

Re: svn commit: r1879889 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES include/ap_mmn.h modules/dav/main/mod_dav.h modules/dav/main/props.c

On 15 Jul 2020, at 16:18, Greg Stein wrote: > You're already changing the API ... why not simply introduce insert_prop_v2() > with the appropriate parameters? This concept of "pass parameters via the > pool" is very disturbing. Changes to these provider APIs can’t be backported, thus the

Re: svn commit: r1879591 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: configure.in server/log.c

On 7/15/20 4:03 PM, Graham Leggett wrote: > On 15 Jul 2020, at 15:35, Joe Orton > wrote: > >>> checking for gettid()... yes >> >> Interesting, can you provide the config.log and "rpm -q glibc"?  With a  >> RHEL8 vm here it does not detect gettid (as I'd expect for

Re: svn commit: r1879889 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES include/ap_mmn.h modules/dav/main/mod_dav.h modules/dav/main/props.c

You're already changing the API ... why not simply introduce insert_prop_v2() with the appropriate parameters? This concept of "pass parameters via the pool" is very disturbing. Cheers, -g On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 8:56 AM wrote: > Author: minfrin > Date: Wed Jul 15 13:56:55 2020 > New Revision:

Re: svn commit: r1879591 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: configure.in server/log.c

On 15 Jul 2020, at 15:35, Joe Orton wrote: >> checking for gettid()... yes > > Interesting, can you provide the config.log and "rpm -q glibc"? With a > RHEL8 vm here it does not detect gettid (as I'd expect for glibc 2.28) > and builds fine. A quick and dirty search across config.log shows

Re: svn commit: r1879591 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: configure.in server/log.c

On 7/15/20 3:52 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > > On 7/15/20 2:58 PM, Graham Leggett wrote: >> On 07 Jul 2020, at 15:40, jor...@apache.org wrote: >> >>> Author: jorton >>> Date: Tue Jul  7 13:40:15 2020 >>> New Revision: 1879591 >>> >>> URL:

Re: svn commit: r1879591 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: configure.in server/log.c

On 7/15/20 2:58 PM, Graham Leggett wrote: > On 07 Jul 2020, at 15:40, jor...@apache.org wrote: > >> Author: jorton >> Date: Tue Jul  7 13:40:15 2020 >> New Revision: 1879591 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1879591=rev >> Log: >> Check for and use gettid()

Re: svn commit: r1879591 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: configure.in server/log.c

On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 02:58:43PM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote: > On 07 Jul 2020, at 15:40, jor...@apache.org wrote: > > Author: jorton > > Date: Tue Jul 7 13:40:15 2020 > > New Revision: 1879591 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1879591=rev > > Log: > > Check for and use gettid()

Re: svn commit: r1879888 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES include/ap_mmn.h modules/dav/main/mod_dav.h modules/dav/main/util.c

Seems these helper functions would be a better fit within apr_xml, rather than httpd. On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 8:16 AM wrote: > Author: minfrin > Date: Wed Jul 15 13:16:19 2020 > New Revision: 1879888 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1879888=rev > Log: > mod_dav: Add utility functions

Re: svn commit: r1879591 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: configure.in server/log.c

On 07 Jul 2020, at 15:40, jor...@apache.org wrote: > Author: jorton > Date: Tue Jul 7 13:40:15 2020 > New Revision: 1879591 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1879591=rev > Log: > Check for and use gettid() directly if available; glibc 2.30 and later > provides a wrapper for the system

Re: svn commit: r1879641 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ CHANGES STATUS server/util_script.c

On 7/15/20 9:06 AM, Luca Toscano wrote: > Hi everybody, > > getting back on this. I checked mergeinfo and r1879253 r1879348 are > not listed, what is the best path forward to fix this? (Asking because > I have never merged from trunk, and I am not sure what is the best > path forward). Try

Re: svn commit: r1879641 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ CHANGES STATUS server/util_script.c

Hi everybody, getting back on this. I checked mergeinfo and r1879253 r1879348 are not listed, what is the best path forward to fix this? (Asking because I have never merged from trunk, and I am not sure what is the best path forward). Thanks in advance, Luca On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 11:20 PM