Re: svn commit: r1882776 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/.travis.yml

2020-11-02 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 11/2/20 6:02 PM, Joe Orton wrote: > On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 09:25:05PM +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote: >> Are the following ones good candidates? They also do LDAP and SSL tests >> which could be interesting as I guess that Focal has newer >> LDAP and SSL libs compared to Bionic: > > I'm a

Re: svn commit: r1882776 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/.travis.yml

2020-11-02 Thread Joe Orton
On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 09:25:05PM +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > Are the following ones good candidates? They also do LDAP and SSL tests which > could be interesting as I guess that Focal has newer > LDAP and SSL libs compared to Bionic: I'm a bit worried about running pool-debug tests more

Re: Lingering close + unwritten data == failed connections

2020-11-02 Thread Joe Orton
On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 01:57:08AM +0100, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 6:40 PM Joe Orton wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 05:17:01PM +0100, Adam Hill wrote: > > > On Linux at least, you can see how much unsent data remains by querying > > > the > > > SIOCOUTQ ioctl, so the

Re: Lingering close + unwritten data == failed connections

2020-11-02 Thread Adam Hill
Hi Yann, Yep, I can confirm that the patch fixes the issue. Interestingly ( or maybe not ) I had a quick glance at apr_socket_close and it seems to set a SO_LINGER timeout of 30 seconds, so I sort of expected the problem still to happen but at half the transfer rate but that doesn't seem to