> On Mar 9, 2022, at 11:19 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.53-rc2 a
On 3/10/22 9:09 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> First thanks to Stefan for downgrading his release system. It is a good
> workaround for the observed problems.
>
> Since downgrades are not a long term solution, here's the status info to
> avoid confusion.
>
> We observed two problems that had to do
On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 5:20 PM Stefan Eissing wrote:
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.53-rc2 as 2.4.53:
[X] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
All good on Debian 10, 11 & 12.
Thanks Stefan for RMing, now we know that rc+
> Am 09.03.2022 um 17:19 schrieb Stefan Eissing :
>
> Hi all,
>
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.53-rc2 as 2.
On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 05:19:22PM +0100, Stefan Eissing wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.53-r
First thanks to Stefan for downgrading his release system. It is a good
workaround for the observed problems.
Since downgrades are not a long term solution, here's the status info to
avoid confusion.
We observed two problems that had to do with using a recent autoconf
version (2.70 an above)
