On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 11:33:16AM +0100, Ingo Franzki wrote:
> On 13.12.2023 10:55, Joe Orton wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 01:02:01PM +0100, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> >> Oh, scratch that. Actually the engine API requires a "SSLCryptoDevice
> >> pkcs11" too, so we wouldn't take the
On 13.12.2023 10:55, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 01:02:01PM +0100, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>> Oh, scratch that. Actually the engine API requires a "SSLCryptoDevice
>> pkcs11" too, so we wouldn't take the !mc->szCryptoDevice path.
>> Sorry for the noise.
>
> Yes it should remain
On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 01:02:01PM +0100, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> Oh, scratch that. Actually the engine API requires a "SSLCryptoDevice
> pkcs11" too, so we wouldn't take the !mc->szCryptoDevice path.
> Sorry for the noise.
Yes it should remain compatible like that, though you prompted me to