On Die 20.06.2006 14:15, Jeff Trawick wrote:
[snipped]
A past discussion of very closely related functionality, though not
exactly what you asked for originally, yielded multiple interested
admin-type folks and no developers expressing interest other than
myself.
Sorry, i think i have
On Die 20.06.2006 18:40, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
A past discussion of very closely related functionality, though not
exactly what you asked for originally, yielded multiple interested
admin-type folks and no developers expressing interest other than
myself.
And also
On Mon 19.06.2006 07:07, Jeff Trawick wrote:
If httpd *developers* are interested, we should decide what type of
processing is acceptable/required first and worry about whether it can
be fitted into apr second. As I recall from the last discussion of this
perhaps 15 months ago, most all of the
On Son 18.06.2006 22:25, Mathieu CARBONNEAUX wrote:
ok i've forget that possibility :)
but using strace directly by attaching to processus can be risky in
production (like gdb!)...
and with apache with 256 or 512 processuss all working can be hard to
debug...
in some time have lost the
On Son 18.06.2006 21:42, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
Anyway, as others have pointed out, this topic is off-topic here.
Sorry for that, which list is the right one from your point of view?
Regards
Alex
On Sam 17.06.2006 00:54, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 06/16/2006 10:28 PM, Alexander Lazic wrote:
Any opinion from the developer, to this issue?!
On Don 01.06.2006 08:14, Alexander Lazic wrote:
Is it possible to get a logentry from the hooks in apache to see the
flow of a request?
eg
On Sam 17.06.2006 13:14, Nick Kew wrote:
On Saturday 17 June 2006 09:47, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 06/17/2006 08:57 AM, Alexander Lazic wrote:
On Sam 17.06.2006 00:54, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
From my current point of view the answer is: No, this is not
possible out of the box.
It may
Any opinion from the developer, to this issue?!
On Don 01.06.2006 08:14, Alexander Lazic wrote:
Hi,
i have read http://httpd.apache.org/dev/debugging.html and asked me
follwing:
Is it possible to get a logentry from the hooks in apache to see the
flow of a request?
eg:
$REQUEST accepted
Hi,
i have read http://httpd.apache.org/dev/debugging.html and asked me
follwing:
Is it possible to get a logentry from the hooks in apache to see the
flow of a request?
eg:
$REQUEST accepted on $FD
$REQUEST handled by $MOD_xxx
$REQUEST handled by $MOD_xxx
$REQUEST handled by $MOD_xxx
On Fre 14.04.2006 15:12, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
... that would prevent me from rolling early tomorrow? Please raise
hands now, and lets see if we can't get them committed. I'm thinking
of patches-to-apply, not new efforts :) There's always 2.0.57 for new
and exciting bug fixes.
Is this
Hi,
On Mon 10.04.2006 09:52, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 4/8/06, Alexander Lazic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this a known bug?!
y; I've been looking at this type of problem for a few days...
hopefully I can post a patch before long
Thanx for your positive answer ;-)
Apache works fine except
Hi,
on 05-04-2006 i have get the latest snapshots from:
http://cvs.apache.org/snapshots/
httpd-2.0.x_20060405102636.tar.gz
apr-0.9.x_20060405102142.tar.gz
apr-util-0.9.x_20060405102200.tar.gz
Build it on solaris 10 x86 with gcc.
./configure --prefix=/web/apache-2.0.56 --with-mpm=worker
Hi,
On Sam 03.12.2005 11:36, Paul Querna wrote:
My intention is for this to be a wide open brainstorming thread.
I expect that we will be able to discuss several ideas in much more
detail at the Hackathon next week, but I really want to get all ideas
'on the table'.
my whish is very simple:
Hi,
On Fre 18.11.2005 00:55, Alexander Lazic wrote:
On Mit 16.11.2005 19:09, Alexander Lazic wrote:
@Joe Orton: do you have a patch for mod_proxy_connect?
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19188
as joe suggested i have start to implement the connect call with
proxy_connect.c
Hi,
On Mit 16.11.2005 19:09, Alexander Lazic wrote:
@Joe Orton: do you have a patch for mod_proxy_connect?
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19188
as joe suggested i have start to implement the connect call with
proxy_connect.c.
I have attached my first attempt
Hi,
i haven't found a bugfix for these, isn't any there or have i over read
ist?
Have the 2.1.x these bug also?!
Thanx
Alex
Hi,
On Fre 15.04.2005 11:54, Joe Orton wrote:
Thanks for the report, there were three segfaults actually; I've fixed
them on the trunk.
Thanks ;-)
one of the segfaults was because you're using a -c value -n, which
doesn't really make sense; I changed ab to reject that.
Ops, sorry :-(
al ;-)
Hi,
i use the 2.1 tunk ab and have found 2 segfaults, it think.
the first one was easy to find:
in ssl_print_cert_info() the buf is 64 not BUFSIZ
for eg. =X509_NAME_oneline(dn, buf, BUFSIZ);
The second one was not so easy to find because i'am not very familiar
with the openssl-development.
After
Hi,
i have read the rfc 2616 and have a understanding question to you, if
you can help me ;-))
---
8.1.2.2 Pipelining
A client that supports persistent connections MAY pipeline its
requests (i.e., send multiple requests without waiting for each
response). A server MUST send its responses to
Hi,
i need more the one param from the response from server.
I have try:
---
url method=GET responsename=fR
responsetemplate=frameRendered=([^amp;]*)
responsename=zz responsetemplate=zz=([^amp;]*) REQUEST_URL/url
---
but it looks like to be the wrong way :-(
Please can anybody point me to the
Hi,
i try to make some loadtests and need some vars from the respone.
Please can anybody tell why i get these error:
Error parsing XML: XML parser error code: not well-formed (invalid token) (4)
---
?xml version=1.0 standalone=no?
!DOCTYPE flood SYSTEM flood.dtd
flood configversion=1
urllist
On Fre 11.02.2005 10:53, Norman Tuttle wrote:
Easy. You have an illegal character in your XML, the .
This needs to be changed to amp;
Oh sh... thx :-(
al ;-)
Hi,
i got this mail:
---
On Die 01.06.2004 23:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
htmlbody
Dear user of bApache.org/b,br
br
Your e-mail account has been temporary disabled because of unauthorized
access.brbr
Further details can be obtained from attached file.br
br
Best wishes,br
nbsp; nbsp; The
Hi,
i have tested the apache 2.0.43 with mod_rewrite and can't expand the
%{ENV:SSL_CIPHER} nor %{ENV:GATEWAY_INTERFACE} in the '/cgi-bin/'-dir.
I think i have found the possible failure/bug in the function
'do_expand' on line 2433 in mod_rewrite.c:
span = apr_cpystrn(outp, lookup_variable(r,
24 matches
Mail list logo
