mod_ssl fix for PR# 27106

2004-03-09 Thread Andy Cutright
hi all, apacheweek has announced a vulnerability: http://www.apacheweek.com/features/security-20 the bugzilla problem report indicates this diff fixes the problem: http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/httpd-2.0/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_io.c? r1=1.117r2=1.118 recent email on the dev list includes

RE: mod_ssl fix for PR# 27106

2004-03-09 Thread Andy Cutright
thanks, andy -Original Message- From: Joe Orton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 6:14 AM To: Andy Cutright Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: mod_ssl fix for PR# 27106 On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 02:47:10PM -0800, Andy Cutright wrote: apacheweek has

mixing c c++ on HP-UX

2003-03-31 Thread Andy Cutright
hi all, there was some discussion on this list about HP-UX and c++ modules. we had a mixture like this running with 2.0.43. we've recently upgraded to 2.0.44, and we're now experiencing problems at load time. i'm wondering if anyone is running 2.0.44 on HP-UX with c++ modules successfully,

Re: mixing c c++ on HP-UX

2003-03-31 Thread Andy Cutright
: Andy, there were new fixes in 2.0.45 that should address this. See... http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/apr/dso/unix/dso.c Bill At 04:57 PM 3/31/2003, Andy Cutright wrote: hi all, there was some discussion on this list about HP-UX and c++ modules. we had a mixture like this running

Re: Mod_ssl for Apache 2.0.39 on W2K and using Bison for apache compiling

2002-12-20 Thread Andy Cutright
you can hack this stuff out, i believe. try looking through .mak file that's giving you problems get rid of the comand being issued for that target, or get rid of the target. i _think_ you'll find that the bison stuff is trying ultimately to create an already existing header file. caveat

ltconfig, libtool, 2.0.39 vs. 2.0.43

2002-12-18 Thread Andy Cutright
hi all, i've been wrestling with linking running 2.0.43 on AIX 5.1 for a couple of days. we have 2.0.39 running fine. i've pulled down both the unix source code .tar.Z the windows source code distribution. i see something i'm not sure about in httpd-2.0.43/srclib/apr/build/ltconfig:

Re: ltconfig, libtool, 2.0.39 vs. 2.0.43

2002-12-18 Thread Andy Cutright
hi all, more information. all the ltmain.sh files seem to have regressed from 2.0.39 to 2.0.43. is this on purpose? the first set of greps is from 2.0.43, and the second from 2.0.39 to the best of my knowledge. /httpd-2.0.43 foreach FILE (`find . -name ltmain.sh`) ? cat $FILE |grep VERSION ?

Re: compatibility with C++ modules

2002-09-06 Thread Andy Cutright
hi, so could you possibly speak those unspeakable hacks you've made to apache to run c++ modules on hp? we're trying to get a c++ module linked into 2.0.39. any help would be appreciated. we can take this particular aspect of the discussion out of this forum, if you'd prefer, cheers andy

compile time issue

2002-05-24 Thread Andy Cutright
hi all, my apologies if this is not the appropriate forum. i have two compile/ link issues. [EMAIL PROTECTED] doesn't appear appropriate; most folks there aren't discussing compiler or linker isssues. mod_ssl.so doesn't seem to be linking the openssl libs, like lcrypto, so ldd -r is reporting