Re: apr_global_mutex_child_init & mod_watch

2003-09-08 Thread Anthony Howe
flock is used on FreeBSD by default... flock requires that chmod be done on the lock in the child init As an aside, why is flock() used on FreeBSD? It has SysV like mutexes and POSIX ones too (at least in 4.8) - I may sound unsure cause I've only recently switched platforms from Linux to FreeBS

Re: apr_global_mutex_child_init & mod_watch

2003-09-08 Thread Anthony Howe
this is a situation where mod_rewrite wasn't a great place to look since mod_rewrite never handled this situation correctly in 2.0, and I fixed mod_rewrite in 2.1-dev by teaching unixd_set_global_mutex_perms() to be smarter... unfortunately, the change has not yet been merged into the stable t

Re: apr_global_mutex_child_init & mod_watch

2003-09-08 Thread Anthony Howe
flock is used on FreeBSD by default... flock requires that chmod be done on the lock in the child init if you look at Apache 2.1-dev, unixd_set_global_mutex_perms() has been changed to handle the chmod() for you You mean chown() right? Or do you mean both chmod() and chown()? at Apache 2.0.48

Re: 2 off-topic questions

2003-03-28 Thread Anthony Howe
Ian Holsman wrote: 1. does anyone know of a tool which can replay http traffic caught via tcpdump, and possibly change the hostname/ip# of the host. http://www.ethereal.com/ might work. 2. I heard mention of a module which logs post-data (and works in apache2) can anyone remember the name. http:

Re: Proposed solution for bug #16056

2003-03-01 Thread Anthony Howe
Has there been any further discussion of this? Anthony Howe William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: At 06:14 AM 2/5/2003, Anthony Howe wrote: Please find enclosed a proposed solution for the bug I posted last month: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16056 The source code comments in the

Re: Proposed solution for bug #16056

2003-02-05 Thread Anthony Howe
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16056 Anthony, I like the gist of your patch, but your ownership observations were correct; we can't implement this patch as written. This was just addressed in recent Apache releases and will continue to be tightened, not loosened. Bugger.

Proposed solution for bug #16056

2003-02-05 Thread Anthony Howe
(Please forgive the cross post, but I felt it relavent to the httpd group, since it impacts them and module developers such as myself.) Please find enclosed a proposed solution for the bug I posted last month: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16056 The source code comment