On Mon, 2004-06-07 at 21:06, Greg Stein wrote:
> Oops. Fitz mis-typed. Tags are O(1). Very cheap. Very fast.
Thanks, Greg. Dangers of replying to emails while eating dinner. :-)
-Fitz
On Mon, 2004-06-07 at 12:30, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> At 08:45 AM 6/7/2004, Bill Stoddard wrote:
> >Brian W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
> >>On Jun 6, 2004, at 10:42 PM, Geoffrey Young wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>>FYI, Fitz did a conversion of apache-1.
On Jun 7, 2004, at 8:45 AM, Bill Stoddard wrote:
Brian W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
On Jun 6, 2004, at 10:42 PM, Geoffrey Young wrote:
FYI, Fitz did a conversion of apache-1.3, which is now located at
http://svn.apache.org/repos/test/httpd/. (in the test repository).
wow, that's a lot of data
On Jun 6, 2004, at 10:42 PM, Geoffrey Young wrote:
FYI, Fitz did a conversion of apache-1.3, which is now located at
http://svn.apache.org/repos/test/httpd/. (in the test repository).
wow, that's a lot of data - 10 minutes later and I'm still
downloading...
Wait! No! You don't want to check out
On Jun 6, 2004, at 5:16 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
One minor nit: I thought cvs2svn set the svn:ignore property and
tossed the .cvsignore files?
Not yet. http://cvs2svn.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10
-Fitz
I'm in the process of testing out the cvs2svn.py converter, and the
converter found an inconsistency in the httpd-2.0 repository.
The file
/httpd-2.0/docs/manual/misc/Attic/known_client_problems.html,v
Contains
APACHE_1_2_X:1.3;
which is a tag at rev 1.3, while all other rcs declarations of th
On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 11:17, Sander Striker wrote:
> > From: Brian. W. Fitzpatrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 5:53 PM
>
> > I'm in the process of testing out the cvs2svn.py converter, and the
> > converter found an inconsist
On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 11:17, Sander Striker wrote:
> > From: Brian. W. Fitzpatrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 5:53 PM
>
> > I'm in the process of testing out the cvs2svn.py converter, and the
> > converter found an inconsist
On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 11:17, Sander Striker wrote:
> > From: Brian. W. Fitzpatrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 5:53 PM
>
> > I'm in the process of testing out the cvs2svn.py converter, and the
> > converter found an inconsist
On Wed, 2004-02-18 at 05:13, Sascha Schumann wrote:
> Automake is clearly not a choice, nor has it ever been for a
> project of considerable size. And recursive make clearly
> sucks -- the PHP project got rid of it 2 years ago. We agree
> on these points.
+1
> > It was also writ
10 matches
Mail list logo
