RE: Apache proxy behaviour...

Well, I think increasing the proxy timeout isn’t a good idea on a reverse-proxy in a production environment as it quickly monopolize, when one of the proxied webservers badly crash, a huge amount of httpd process waiting for this timeout to occur …   Anyway, even if the Apache timeout is

Apache proxy behaviour...

Title: Apache proxy behaviour... Hi there, I came with a problem which surprise me, as I thought Apache was working differently... We have Apache 2.0.55 working in reverse-proxy in front of different webservers. One of our website takes a long time to process requests and respond to the

Mod_Rewrite Performance

Title: Mod_Rewrite Performance Hello, We are using Apache as a Reverse-Proxy for our websites, and we implemented mod_rewrite on it so that we can do some "whitelisting" of our websites' URIs. Our question is, what will give us the best performance : - Many "RewriteRule" options with simple

Question on mod_proxy and mod_rewrite behaviour when a remote pro xy is unavailable

Title: Question on mod_proxy and mod_rewrite behaviour when a remote proxy is unavailable Hello, I just have a very simple question about the behaviour of mod_proxy and mod_rewrite. Our configuration looks like that :   ServerName www.toto.fr   RewriteEngine On   ProxyRequests Off   Rew

Possibility to unset or modify some HTTP headers with mod_headers ?

Title: Possibility to unset or modify some HTTP headers with mod_headers ? Hi there ! Just a small question, is it possible in a HTTP response to unset or modify the Date and Content-Type header with mod_headers ? I can't manage to do it and I'm wondering if there's not a restriction on some

RE: mod_cache not sending "If-Modified-Since" headers

a couple of concerns with the patch as it currently exists. Things like looking for Etag and Last-Modified in only one of the *headers_out locations. I have to finish a piece of high priority work up today and tomorrow and then, hopefully, I can get back to this. Paul J. Reder CASTELLE

mod_cache not sending "If-Modified-Since" headers

ssage d'origine-De : CASTELLE Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Envoyé : jeudi 12 juin 2003 17:49À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]Objet : [PATCH] mod_cache RFC compliance Hello, In order to accelerate the RFC compliance of mod_cache, I propose these two patches which fix two problems : -

RE: [PATCH] mod_cache RFC compliance

dingly. Should be done, tested, and committed soon. Thanks for the kickstart on this. Paul J. Reder CASTELLE Thomas wrote: > Thanks for looking into this Paul ! > > Concerning the second question, I totally agree with you. I tested it > and it works. It is obviously more

RE: [PATCH] mod_cache RFC compliance

g and retrieving the headers correctly, its a bug in the disk_cache code that needs to be fixed. I wouldn't look to mod_disk_cache as an example of how the caching code should be working. :) Thanks in advance for any insight that Thomas or anyone else has to offer on these questions. Given

[PATCH] mod_cache RFC compliance

Title: [PATCH] mod_cache RFC compliance Hello, In order to accelerate the RFC compliance of mod_cache, I propose these two patches which fix two problems : - It doesn't handle the Cache-Control directives (max-age, max-stale, min-fresh...) properly. - It doesn't send a "If-Modified-Since" to

RE: Problem with SSL in 64 bit build on Solaris

_size_t *len) inl happens to be a 'int' type, and apr_size_t is a 'long'.. -Madhu -Original Message- From: CASTELLE Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 2:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Problem with SSL in 64 bit build on S

RE: Problem with SSL in 64 bit build on Solaris

  -Madhu -Original Message-From: CASTELLE Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 1:15 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Problem with SSL in 64 bit build on Solaris Hi there ! I'm sorry to come again with this, but it is quite important to

Problem with SSL in 64 bit build on Solaris

Title: Problem with SSL in 64 bit build on Solaris Hi there ! I'm sorry to come again with this, but it is quite important to us : is someone looking at the bug 16333 I opened a few weeks ago ? I don't need a solution right now, but I would be relieved if I know that someone's looking at it.

RE: mod_cache behaviour in Apache 2.0.44

il... ;-)   Thomas.   -Message d'origine-De : CASTELLE Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Envoyé : vendredi 24 janvier 2003 12:46À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]Objet : mod_cache behaviour in Apache 2.0.44 Hi there ! I'm currently looking at mod_cache to see if it is enough RFC compliant to be

mod_cache behaviour in Apache 2.0.44

Title: mod_cache behaviour in Apache 2.0.44 Hi there ! I'm currently looking at mod_cache to see if it is enough RFC compliant to be used in production environment, and I pointed to something that seems a bug to me, maybe can you help : in cache_util.c, in the ap_cache_check_freshness funct

Mod_disk_cache garbage-collecting question

Title: Mod_disk_cache garbage-collecting question Hi there ! I just have a very simple question concerning garbage-collecting under mod_disk_cache. It doesn't seem to be implemented yet (by the way, is there a deadline for this ?), but there is a CacheSize directive which seems to be base