Apache proxy behaviour...

2006-02-02 Thread CASTELLE Thomas
Title: Apache proxy behaviour... Hi there, I came with a problem which surprise me, as I thought Apache was working differently... We have Apache 2.0.55 working in reverse-proxy in front of different webservers. One of our website takes a long time to process requests and respond to the

RE: Apache proxy behaviour...

2006-02-02 Thread CASTELLE Thomas
Well, I think increasing the proxy timeout isnt a good idea on a reverse-proxy in a production environment as it quickly monopolize, when one of the proxied webservers badly crash, a huge amount of httpd process waiting for this timeout to occur Anyway, even if the Apache timeout is

Mod_Rewrite Performance

2005-05-21 Thread CASTELLE Thomas
Title: Mod_Rewrite Performance Hello, We are using Apache as a Reverse-Proxy for our websites, and we implemented mod_rewrite on it so that we can do some whitelisting of our websites' URIs. Our question is, what will give us the best performance : - Many RewriteRule options with simple

Question on mod_proxy and mod_rewrite behaviour when a remote pro xy is unavailable

2004-04-21 Thread CASTELLE Thomas
Title: Question on mod_proxy and mod_rewrite behaviour when a remote proxy is unavailable Hello, I just have a very simple question about the behaviour of mod_proxy and mod_rewrite. Our configuration looks like that : VirtualHost 10.10.10.10 ServerName www.toto.fr RewriteEngine On

mod_cache not sending If-Modified-Since headers

2003-12-10 Thread CASTELLE Thomas
ine-De: CASTELLE Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Envoyé: jeudi 12 juin 2003 17:49À: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Objet: [PATCH] mod_cache RFC compliance Hello, In order to accelerate the RFC compliance of mod_cache, I propose these two patches which fix two problems : - It doesn't handle

RE: mod_cache not sending If-Modified-Since headers

2003-12-10 Thread CASTELLE Thomas
with the patch as it currently exists. Things like looking for Etag and Last-Modified in only one of the *headers_out locations. I have to finish a piece of high priority work up today and tomorrow and then, hopefully, I can get back to this. Paul J. Reder CASTELLE Thomas wrote: Hello everyone, I

RE: [PATCH] mod_cache RFC compliance

2003-08-09 Thread CASTELLE Thomas
, and committed soon. Thanks for the kickstart on this. Paul J. Reder CASTELLE Thomas wrote: Thanks for looking into this Paul ! Concerning the second question, I totally agree with you. I tested it and it works. It is obviously more logical... I hope you will be able to integrate

[PATCH] mod_cache RFC compliance

2003-06-12 Thread CASTELLE Thomas
Title: [PATCH] mod_cache RFC compliance Hello, In order to accelerate the RFC compliance of mod_cache, I propose these two patches which fix two problems : - It doesn't handle the Cache-Control directives (max-age, max-stale, min-fresh...) properly. - It doesn't send a If-Modified-Since to

RE: Problem with SSL in 64 bit build on Solaris

2003-02-20 Thread CASTELLE Thomas
, and apr_size_t is a 'long'.. -Madhu -Original Message- From: CASTELLE Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 2:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Problem with SSL in 64 bit build on Solaris Well, actually we had problems with a 64-bit build

RE: Problem with SSL in 64 bit build on Solaris

2003-02-13 Thread CASTELLE Thomas
Message-From: CASTELLE Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 1:15 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Problem with SSL in 64 bit build on Solaris Hi there ! I'm sorry to come again with this, but it is quite important to us : is someone looking at the bug

Problem with SSL in 64 bit build on Solaris

2003-02-12 Thread CASTELLE Thomas
Title: Problem with SSL in 64 bit build on Solaris Hi there ! I'm sorry to come again with this, but it is quite important to us : is someone looking at the bug 16333 I opened a few weeks ago ? I don't need a solution right now, but I would be relieved if I know that someone's looking at

mod_cache behaviour in Apache 2.0.44

2003-01-24 Thread CASTELLE Thomas
Title: mod_cache behaviour in Apache 2.0.44 Hi there ! I'm currently looking at mod_cache to see if it is enough RFC compliant to be used in production environment, and I pointed to something that seems a bug to me, maybe can you help : in cache_util.c, in the ap_cache_check_freshness

RE: mod_cache behaviour in Apache 2.0.44

2003-01-24 Thread CASTELLE Thomas
ine-De: CASTELLE Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Envoyé: vendredi 24 janvier 2003 12:46À: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Objet: mod_cache behaviour in Apache 2.0.44 Hi there ! I'm currently looking at mod_cache to see if it is enough RFC compliant to be used in production environment, and I pointed to

Mod_disk_cache garbage-collecting question

2003-01-22 Thread CASTELLE Thomas
Title: Mod_disk_cache garbage-collecting question Hi there ! I just have a very simple question concerning garbage-collecting under mod_disk_cache. It doesn't seem to be implemented yet (by the way, is there a deadline for this ?), but there is a CacheSize directive which seems to be