Me again.
Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 11:43:07PM +0400, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
> In the presence of the subjectAltName with the DNS
> entries in it, the DNS name of the server SHOULD (if memory servers
> me right: I am not able to find the reference document now) be
> checked against the su
Good day!
Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 06:48:41PM +0100, Jay L. T. Cornwall wrote:
> Virtual hosts and SSL don't mix. Or so people say, for the simple reason
> that in order to reach the HTTP negotiation an SSL connection must be
> established first with a certificate/key pair.
>
> If you give it a try,
Julian,
Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 03:22:53PM +0200, Julian Reschke wrote:
> >So, your point is that Apache should make no attempts to rewrite
> >the 'Destination' header for DAV and clients should use absolute
> >paths for DAV. Or we still need 'Destination' rewriting? In the
> >reverse proxy mode, I m
Julian,
Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 01:12:54PM +0200, Julian Reschke wrote:
> >Pardon for my stupideness, but what 'that reason' you are talking
> >about? The previous letter was rather long and I fail to identify
> >the exact point you're commenting. Could you, please, elaborate
> >a bit?
>
> Sorry.
>
Julian, good day.
Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 06:52:59PM +0200, Julian Reschke wrote:
> Eygene Ryabinkin schrieb:
> >Good day!
> >Sorry for rather long letter, but this is the summary from numerous
> >discuissions and I really tried to make it short.
> >...
>
&g
Good day!
Sorry for rather long letter, but this is the summary from numerous
discuissions and I really tried to make it short.
I happened to notice the wrong behaviour of the Apache proxying
modules (originally, mod_proxy, but later the mod_rewrite and
essentially, all clients of mod_proxy rewri
