Hi,
a few days ago I've submitted the bugreport below
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57543
I was pondering on removing some rust from my C programming skills and
try to create a patch for this issue. However I'd like to get some
feedback from the developers who worked on it.
Q
'
behavior when one of the backend servers becomes completely unreachable
(e.g: power failure).
I think it definitively makes sense to have both timeouts configurable
separately.
Are there already any plans in that direction?
Regards,
Federico
--
Federico Mennite
causes a major pain.
--
Federico Mennite
preventing it
from being applied.
The is attacched to the bug report.
Regards.
--
Federico Mennite
end on configuration. Probably they could be
forced to NO reverse lookups.
Regards.
--
Federico Mennite
diff -urN apache_1.3.27/src/ApacheCore.def apache_1.3.27.ite/src/ApacheCore.def
--- apache_1.3.27/src/ApacheCore.def2002-06-18 06:19:46.0 +0200
+++ apache_1.3.27.ite/src/Apa
doesn't seem so anymore :)
So getting the configuration from the core module is the path to go.
I'll rehash my patch.
Regards.
--
Federico Mennite
.168.1.1:443
ServerName some.host.com
SSLEngine On
SSLCertificateFile/opt/apache/conf/ssl.crt/my.crt
SSLCertificateKeyFile /opt/apache/conf/ssl.key/my.key
ProxyPass/ http://192.168.2.1:80/
ProxyPassReverse / http://192.168.2.1:80/
Best regards.
--
Federico Mennite
d