If interested, my initial blog post about the issue in relation to mod_wsgi
is now posted at:
* http://blog.dscpl.com.au/2015/01/important-modwsgi-information-about.html
The link to that has also been posted on the mod_wsgi mailing list and
Twitter.
Graham
On 13 January 2015 at 16:34, Graham
On 14 January 2015 at 09:10, wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
- Original Message -
Subject: Re: Re: CVE-2013-5704 fix breaks mod_wsgi
From: Graham Dumpleton grah...@apache.org
Date: 1/12/15 11:34 pm
To: dev@httpd.apache.org dev@httpd.apache.org
But the damage has been done
as work on
the hack that tries to infer the request_rec size to work out if the CVE
change has been back ported.
Graham
On 12 January 2015 at 23:20, Graham Dumpleton grah...@apache.org wrote:
On 12 January 2015 at 22:27, Joe Orton jor...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 09:04:12AM
On 12 January 2015 at 22:27, Joe Orton jor...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 09:04:12AM +1100, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
1. Verify that recompiling mod_wsgi is actually sufficient given than my
direct use of request_rec isn't going to populate the extra fields
But the damage has been done for some months on 2.2, and we are noticing
this, now?
All distros still shipping Apache 2.2 still are using older mod_wsgi 3.X
versions which I don't at this point believe are affected by this issue.
People who build stuff from source code themselves would be using
to update APR soon as well as httpd.
Graham
On 10 January 2015 at 09:04, Graham Dumpleton grah...@apache.org wrote:
Thanks for the heads up and I appreciate very much the steps you are
taking to limit possible affects.
What I will do is the following:
1. Verify that recompiling mod_wsgi
= apr_socket_wait(sock, APR_WAIT_WRITE);
#endif
Either way, a minor tweak to mod_wsgi code.
Graham
On 10 January 2015 at 14:28, Graham Dumpleton grah...@apache.org wrote:
FWIW, there is potentially another issue for mod_wsgi coming up as well.
Seems that I was using an APR function which was tagged
Thanks for the heads up and I appreciate very much the steps you are taking
to limit possible affects.
What I will do is the following:
1. Verify that recompiling mod_wsgi is actually sufficient given than my
direct use of request_rec isn't going to populate the extra fields and they
will remain
Sounds like it would perhaps be for the same reason as mod_wsgi has issues
with that sort of thing.
Only Apache child worker processes get special dispensation as far as
graceful shutdowns or reloads are concerned. If instead a module creates
additional processes using the other child API calls
On 24 November 2014 at 04:59, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
If you're doing Python web apps it would be cool to pip install httpd
FRAMEWORK-httpd-wiring and have a command that wires it up based on
framework settings and a bit of other declarative configuration. (similar
for other
On 22 October 2014 13:51, Yehuda Katz yeh...@ymkatz.net wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
To me, this does not exonerate mod_php, it implicates it. I suspect
your source code
.
As for the passing right now, you don't need the whole mod_rewrite
machinery
for this:
SetEnvIf Authorization (.+) HTTP_AUTHORIZATION=$1
that's, what I've been using so far :)
nd
* Graham Dumpleton wrote:
A few comments on this.
The first is that mod_wsgi originally never allowed its
A few comments on this.
The first is that mod_wsgi originally never allowed its
WSGIPassAuthorization directive in a htaccess file, and then when it it did
first allow it, it was only honoured if AuthConfig was allowed for that
context.
I kept having people who needed that ability when they had
WSGIApplicationGroup %{GLOBAL} to run un the
main interpreter context but the issue persists after executing apache
graceful or reload.
Regards
2014-07-16 13:44 GMT+00:00 Graham Dumpleton grah...@apache.org:
It is well known that the lxml package doesn't work properly in a Python
sub
It is well known that the lxml package doesn't work properly in a Python
sub interpreter context. Force it to run in the main interpreter context.
See:
http://code.google.com/p/modwsgi/wiki/ApplicationIssues#Python_Simplified_GIL_State_API
In other words look at using:
WSGIApplicationGroup
What I don't quite understand is why the Linux manual pages:
http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/unix.7.html
are even promoting the style:
offsetof(struct sockaddr_un, sun_path) + strlen(sun_path) + 1
That would produce a length with is technically 1 greater than what the
size of
Ahh, I am partly being a goose. I kept reading that strlen() as sizeof()
when reading the manual page. :-(
Graham
On 1 June 2014 21:44, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 3:10 AM, Graham Dumpleton grah...@apache.org
wrote:
What I don't quite understand is why
In mod_proxy_fdpass there is a function socket_connect_un():
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/mod_proxy_fdpass.c
which contains the code:
rv = connect(rawsock, (struct sockaddr*)sa,
sizeof(*sa) + strlen(sa-sun_path));
Can
On 21 February 2014 02:23, Joe Orton jor...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 07:52:34AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
WSGI 3.4 daemon mode crashing with httpd 2.4.x...
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 0xaef17b70 (LWP 32761)]
0x08078a32 in
On 17 November 2013 22:05, jean-frederic clere jfcl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way to trigger a clean recreation of a child from a module?
See the apr_proc_other_child_*() family of functions.
For an example, go look at the implementation of mod_cgid.
Graham
Don't know if will be applicable in the case of those modules or not, but
mod_python and mod_wsgi have similar conflicts over Python interpreter
initialisation and destruction and have had to do a little dance over who
gets precedence to ensure things don't crash.
In the next version of mod_wsgi
it will
compile. They can only ever keep this up for Apache 2.2 though, as 2.4
differences were too great and minor patches will not make it work there.
Graham
On 6 February 2013 09:30, Mikhail T. mi+t...@aldan.algebra.com wrote:
On 05.02.2013 17:14, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
In the next version
Is this being done in the Apache parent process or only in the child
processes?
If in the Apache parent process, you would still have to call Tcl_Finalize()
at some point wouldn't you to ensure that all memory is reclaimed?
One of the flaws early on in mod_python was that it didn't destroy the
Is this being done in the Apache parent process or only in the child
processes?
If in the Apache parent process, you would still have to call Tcl_Finalize()
at some point wouldn't you to ensure that all memory is reclaimed?
One of the flaws early on in mod_python was that it didn't destroy the
On 6 February 2013 10:53, Mikhail T. mi+t...@aldan.algebra.com wrote:
On 05.02.2013 18:25, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
If in the Apache parent process, you would still have to call Tcl_Finalize()
at some point wouldn't you to ensure that all memory is reclaimed?
I don't think so. If only
You say:
I have traditional Unix-type load-average and the percentage of how
idle and busy the web-server is. But is that enough info? Or is that
too much? How much data should the front-end want or need? Maybe a single
agreed-upon value (ala load average) is best... maybe not. These are the
On 31 October 2011 18:24, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 10/31/2011 2:19 AM, Sander Temme wrote:
Dear Apache developers/users,
I have created a quick survey to see how YOU use Apache and what is
important to you:
http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/HFGDY3C
It's only eight
On 18 March 2011 07:24, Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote:
I wanted to be sure that folks are aware of what's going on in the
Windows/PHP world. I know that, in one sense, it's not our problem, but it
*feels* like our problem to me, and to many of our users.
PHP5.3.6 was just released,
On 31 December 2010 07:37, Brian McCallister bri...@skife.org wrote:
2010/12/28 Igor Galić i.ga...@brainsware.org:
Hey folks,
I'm looking for some inspiration on how to make good use of
mod_lua. Those familiar with its documentation, might find
it a little bit lacking in this regard.
My
On 31 December 2010 10:56, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 12/30/2010 3:25 PM, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
On 31 December 2010 07:37, Brian McCallister bri...@skife.org wrote:
2010/12/28 Igor Galić i.ga...@brainsware.org:
Hey folks,
I'm looking for some inspiration on how
On 1 September 2010 20:15, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
On 01 Sep 2010, at 6:07 AM, dave b wrote:
What is the rational behind not checking the return value of
apr_palloc and apr_pcalloc?
The rationale is to not be forced to check for and handle hundreds of
potential failure cases
On 1 September 2010 14:07, dave b db.pub.m...@gmail.com wrote:
What is the rational behind not checking the return value of
apr_palloc and apr_pcalloc?
Specifically here talking about why HTTPD code doesn't check. Ie.,
core server code and modules supplied with HTTPD.
I am clarifying this
On 25 August 2010 10:10, Tony Stevenson pct...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 01:04:01AM +0100, Tony Stevenson wrote:
Had to comment out an output filter line in the main httpd.conf (line 117)
More specifically had to disable deflate - AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE
text/html
On Thursday, August 5, 2010, Niklas Edmundsson ni...@acc.umu.se wrote:
On Thu, 5 Aug 2010, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
On Thursday, August 5, 2010, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote:
On Tuesday 03 August 2010, Dan Poirier wrote:
I'd like to propose that in 2.3/2.4, we fail startup for any
2010/8/4 Daniel Ruggeri drugg...@primary.net:
On 8/3/2010 9:57 AM, JeHo Park wrote:
hello ~
it's my first mail to apache dev .. and i am beginner of the apache. :-)
Anyway ... recently, i wrote transparent proxy [tproxy2] patch to the
httpd-2.2.15
because i needed web proxy and needed to
On Monday, July 19, 2010, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 7/18/2010 12:58 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
We have now disabled Sendfile on apache.org, and the load average
dropped from ~80 to 0.35.
Wow.
Is it unreasonable for us to change the API to disable sendfile as the default
On 6 July 2010 22:56, Edgar Frank ef-li...@email.de wrote:
Hi mod_fcgid developers,
I'm currently exploring a potential problem with mod_fcgid.
Let's assume a setup with mod_security and mod_fcgid
(has nothing to do with mod_security itself - it just helps to
trigger the problem).
Now we
On 7 July 2010 11:43, Graham Dumpleton graham.dumple...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6 July 2010 22:56, Edgar Frank ef-li...@email.de wrote:
Hi mod_fcgid developers,
I'm currently exploring a potential problem with mod_fcgid.
Let's assume a setup with mod_security and mod_fcgid
(has nothing to do
On 3 June 2010 10:40, Sander Temme scte...@apache.org wrote:
On Jun 1, 2010, at 9:08 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Considering that 2.3/trunk is back to limbo-land, I'd like
to propose that we be more aggressive is backporting some
items. Even if under experimental, it would be nice if slotmem
On 18 May 2010 05:13, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
mod_fcgid unfortunately allows the FcgidWrapper directive to be
overridden in htaccess when AllowOverride FileInfo is declared. In
all likelihood some users need that (the feature was contributed and
added in mod_fcgid 2.1, it is
2009/12/16 Dan Poirier poir...@pobox.com:
Jordi Prats jordi.pr...@gmail.com writes:
If you start apache with root as usual, you realize that every module
is able to run code with root privileges:
...
Why is coded this way? Shouldn't run with lower privileges?
No. That's not the purpose of
2009/11/25 Edgar Frank ef-li...@email.de:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 05:07 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
Or otherwise, can someone explain the details to me why it is as it is?
Especially in terms of not pipeling data directly (maybe after a little
buffering to build proper FCGI
2009/11/23 christian4apa...@lists.muthpartners.de:
Hello,
We have an internal project where we need the MPM module perchild. The
Apache 2.0 documentation says that the development is not completed. I
talked to my boss and he says I could take maybe any necessary residual
activities,
2009/11/23 Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 4:40 AM,
christian4apa...@lists.muthpartners.de wrote:
Hello,
We have an internal project where we need the MPM module perchild. The
Apache 2.0 documentation says that the development is not completed. I
talked to my boss
2009/11/12 Paul Querna p...@querna.org:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Graham Dumpleton
graham.dumple...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/11/12 Paul Querna p...@querna.org:
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.3-alpha are available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Your votes please;
+/- 1
2009/11/12 Graham Dumpleton graham.dumple...@gmail.com:
2009/11/12 Paul Querna p...@querna.org:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Graham Dumpleton
graham.dumple...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/11/12 Paul Querna p...@querna.org:
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.3-alpha are available at:
http
subversion.
Must of missed it. Remember to do it for apr. :-(
Trying again now.
Graham
2009/11/12 Graham Dumpleton graham.dumple...@gmail.com:
2009/11/12 Graham Dumpleton graham.dumple...@gmail.com:
2009/11/12 Paul Querna p...@querna.org:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Graham Dumpleton
2009/11/12 Graham Dumpleton graham.dumple...@gmail.com:
FWIW, the @??@ symbols are coming from apu-1-config because they are
never expanded by configure script for apr-util. Ie., snippet from
apu-1-config is:
LIBS=-lexpat -liconv
INCLUDES=
LDFLAGS=
LDAP_LIBS=
DBM_LIBS=@LDADD_dbm_db
2009/11/12 Paul Querna p...@querna.org:
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.3-alpha are available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Your votes please;
+/- 1
[ ] Release httpd-2.3.3 as Alpha
Vote closes at 18:00 UTC on Sunday November 15 2009.
Thanks,
Paul
What
2009/11/10 Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Danny Sadinoff danny.sadin...@gmail.com
wrote:
Here are two details of mod_fcgid process management that I've just
learned after a long debug session and squinting at the mod_fcgid
code.
1) symlinks you.
It seems
2009/11/5 Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Let's get 2.4 out. And then let's rip it to shreds and drop
buckets/brigades and fold in serf.
I think we should decide on exactly what problem we're trying to solve,
before we start thinking about how it is to be solved.
I'm
FWIW, the Python specific hosting module called mod_wsgi for Apache
implements named daemon process groups, with ability to control how
WSGI applications are delegated to which process group. This includes
being able to optionally have process group selected based on value of
ENV value set by
2009/8/30 Nick Kew n...@webthing.com:
On 27 Aug 2009, at 17:22, bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
It appears that Apache is violating this paragraph from RFC 2616:
- Upon receiving a request which includes an Expect request-header
field with the 100-continue expectation, an origin
2009/8/4 Petr Hracek phrac...@gmail.com:
I have found in following link: (http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/ModuleLife)
Race conditions during graceful restart
During a graceful restart, old children are still serving old requests while
new children are serving new requests. If the same lock must
2009/8/4 Ruediger Pluem rpl...@apache.org:
On 08/04/2009 09:02 AM, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
2009/8/4 Petr Hracek phrac...@gmail.com:
I have found in following link: (http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/ModuleLife)
Race conditions during graceful restart
During a graceful restart, old children
2009/8/4 Graham Dumpleton graham.dumple...@gmail.com:
2009/8/4 Ruediger Pluem rpl...@apache.org:
On 08/04/2009 09:02 AM, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
2009/8/4 Petr Hracek phrac...@gmail.com:
I have found in following link: (http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/ModuleLife)
Race conditions during
2009/7/8 Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm:
Paul Querna wrote:
It breaks the 1:1: connection mapping to thread (or process) model
which is critical to low memory footprint, with thousands of
connections, maybe I'm just insane, but all of the servers taking
market share, like lighttpd, nginx,
In case you haven't already found it, ensure you have a read of:
http://www.fmc-modeling.org/category/projects/apache/amp/4_3Multitasking_server.html
It may not address the specific question, but certainly will give you
a better overall picture.
The rest of that book is also worth reading as
2009/7/9 Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de:
On 08.07.2009 15:55, Paul Querna wrote:
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 3:05 AM, Graham
Dumpletongraham.dumple...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/7/8 Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm:
Paul Querna wrote:
It breaks the 1:1: connection mapping to thread (or process)
would requests get delegated to each queue? In other
words, what is the high level outcome you are trying to achieve. For
example, are you trying to give priority to certain virtual hosts or
listener ports???
Graham
That is what I wanted to do.
Thank you
Ricardo
Graham Dumpleton-2 wrote
2009/7/7 ricardo13 ricardoogra...@gmail.com:
Graham Dumpleton-2 wrote:
2009/7/7 ricardo13 ricardoogra...@gmail.com:
Hi,
Sorry, I didn't know that was in wrong forum. What's the best list to
write
this doubt ??
You may well be on the right list, but right now it isn't too clear
Rather than keep demanding an answer to how to do whatever it is you
want, that you explain why you want to do it in the first place. Given
what looks like a rather inadequate knowledge of Apache, it is quite
likely you are going about it all the completely wrong way. So, give
some context about
2009/6/29 Yahav bi...@lucent.com:
i would like to set the httpd instance to run as standard linux daemon. the
daemon should be controlled by the init daemon. the problem is that the
apachectl that runs the httpd is starting the main server process then
forking N StarServers and return 0 or
2009/6/24 Kevin J Walters kevin.walt...@morganstanley.com:
M == Matthieu Estrade mestr...@apache.org writes:
M More granular timeout and maybe adaptative timeout is also IMHO a good
M way to improve resistance to this kind of attack.
The current 1.3, 2.0 and 2.2 documentation is in
2009/6/23 Weibin Yao nbubi...@gmail.com:
William A. Rowe, Jr. at 2009-6-23 2:00 wrote:
Andreas Krennmair wrote:
* Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org [2009-06-22 04:30]:
wouldnt limiting the number of simultanous connections from one IP
already help? F.e. something like:
2009/6/22 Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org:
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Krennmair schrieb:
For those who are still unaware of the Slowloris attack, it's a
denial-of-service attack that consumes Apache's resources by opening up
a great number of parallel connections and slowly sending partial
2009/6/9 Akins, Brian brian.ak...@turner.com:
On 6/5/09 11:31 PM, Graham Dumpleton graham.dumple...@gmail.com wrote:
This last example wasn't even related to driving configuration. It was
in practice an actual handler hook implementation for request
processing, not configuration phases
mod_lua to be rewriting a lot I guess.
~Jorge
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Akins, Brianbrian.ak...@turner.com wrote:
On 6/5/09 11:31 PM, Graham Dumpleton graham.dumple...@gmail.com wrote:
This last example wasn't even related to driving configuration. It was
in practice an actual handler
2009/6/6 Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com:
On Jun 4, 2009, at 22:53, Graham Leggett wrote:
This approach doesn't require any changes to httpd itself as the
ability to do this becomes a feature of just the module supporting
that scripting language, eg, mod_lua. The same could also be done for
2009/6/4 Akins, Brian brian.ak...@turner.com:
On 6/3/09 7:50 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group ruediger.pl...@vodafone.com
wrote:
1. There are many and large and complex configurations out in the world.
Which is exactly why I want/need a better way to do them. I'm currently
using a template
2009/6/4 Akins, Brian brian.ak...@turner.com:
On 6/4/09 8:14 AM, Jorge Schrauwen jorge.schrau...@gmail.com wrote:
Like Graham mentioned mod_macro can be of some use here. however since
I'm looping in perl I may as well push the 4 lines needed to httpd
instead of a one line macro replacemen.
2009/6/4 Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group ruediger.pl...@vodafone.com:
2. I admit that some improvements are needed. How about an approach that
allows
to embed a macro / scripting language into the current configuration system
that allows you to do more advanced things if you need to.
(OK, yes
2009/4/9 KaiGai Kohei kai...@ak.jp.nec.com:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
KaiGai Kohei wrote:
However, SElinux does not allow to revert its privilege (security context)
unconditionally, even if it is dynamically changed.
If we want to revert it, the security policy has to allow B-A in addition
2009/4/9 KaiGai Kohei kai...@ak.jp.nec.com:
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
2009/4/9 KaiGai Kohei kai...@ak.jp.nec.com:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
KaiGai Kohei wrote:
However, SElinux does not allow to revert its privilege (security context)
unconditionally, even if it is dynamically changed
2009/4/9 KaiGai Kohei kai...@ak.jp.nec.com:
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
2009/4/9 KaiGai Kohei kai...@ak.jp.nec.com:
The reason why I would like to set privilege prior to the invocation
of contents handler is to apply consistent access controls independent
from what kind of script languages
2009/4/8 KaiGai Kohei kai...@ak.jp.nec.com:
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
2009/4/8 KaiGai Kohei kai...@ak.jp.nec.com:
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
Explain first why using FASTCGI and suexec wouldn't be a better option?
Thease are limited to cgi applications, so we cannot apply such kind
of restriction
2009/4/8 KaiGai Kohei kai...@ak.jp.nec.com:
KaiGai Kohei wrote:
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
2009/4/8 KaiGai Kohei kai...@ak.jp.nec.com:
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
Explain first why using FASTCGI and suexec wouldn't be a better option?
Thease are limited to cgi applications, so we cannot apply
2009/4/8 KaiGai Kohei kai...@ak.jp.nec.com:
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
2009/4/8 KaiGai Kohei kai...@ak.jp.nec.com:
KaiGai Kohei wrote:
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
2009/4/8 KaiGai Kohei kai...@ak.jp.nec.com:
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
Explain first why using FASTCGI and suexec wouldn't be a better
Explain first why using FASTCGI and suexec wouldn't be a better option?
It concerns me that in your plans, even though you are changing the
security context of a single thread within an existing process, that
that thread may still has access to all the process memory and so
could read or modify
2009/4/8 KaiGai Kohei kai...@ak.jp.nec.com:
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
Explain first why using FASTCGI and suexec wouldn't be a better option?
Thease are limited to cgi applications, so we cannot apply such kind
of restriction on the built-in script languages and references on
static documents
Is Apache capable of hosting sites with a unicode host name? Is it
just a matter of listing the IDNA(RFC3490) variant of the name in
ServerName or ServerAlias?
Is this the only way it can be done or if configuration files are
written as UTF-8, could the host name be listed in its UTF-8 form?
2009/2/17 Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org:
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
2009/2/17 Joe Orton jor...@redhat.com:
I did used to perform a dup, but was told that this would cause
problems with file locking. Specifically was told:
I'm getting lost here. What has file locking got to do with it? Does
2009/2/17 Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org:
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
2009/2/17 Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org:
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
2009/2/17 Joe Orton jor...@redhat.com:
I did used to perform a dup, but was told that this would cause
problems with file locking. Specifically was told:
I'm
2009/2/16 Joe Orton jor...@redhat.com:
On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 10:25:08AM +1100, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
...
What the end result of the code is, is that if you have a file bucket
getting this far where length of file is less than 8000 and an EOS
follows it, then the actual file bucket is held
2009/2/17 Joe Orton jor...@redhat.com:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:52:15PM +1100, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
2009/2/16 Joe Orton jor...@redhat.com:
You say:
For me this is an issue as the file descriptor has been supplied from
a special object returned by a higher level application
In ap_core_output_filter() there exists the code starting with:
/* Completed iterating over the brigade, now determine if we want
* to buffer the brigade or send the brigade out on the network.
*
* Save if we haven't accumulated enough bytes to send, the
2008/12/17 Brian McCallister bri...@skife.org:
Actually, -1
Calling it luau is begging for mass user confusion via misspelings in
the LoadModule directive.
How about:
ap_lua, moon, or just bite the bullet and use mod_lua
Given that there could be a class of such scripting language modules
2008/12/9 William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Paul Querna wrote:
The change fixed velocity.apache.org, but broke www.apache.org.
All of this sub-request + output filter stuff started in r620133 kinda
needs some more thought.
My thought is that fast_internal_subrequest (which I last
2008/12/3 Jayasingh Samuel [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hai,
I have a hash map which takes its input and key from a file.. The file
content will be changed automatically and i want to reload the hash map
automatically after hitting some handler.. What i see is, after reloading
the hash map, iam able
2008/4/13 Guenter Knauf [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
Please specify which headers specifically you consider to be public.
at least:
mod_cache.h
mod_core.h
mod_dav.h
mod_dbd.h
mod_proxy.h
mod_session.h
Also:
mod_auth.h
So it doesn't get missed out of Windows installers like it has
2008/4/11 Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all,
Just wondering if anyone has a link or howto that would give me some
background info on the interface with the different MPM
modes/implementations? I'm not even sure where the different
implementations are in the source tree, but I'm
On 03/04/2008, Olexandr Prokhorenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone,
I am working on the input filter which is going to catch on input requests,
find the bucket with Host: , modify it and pass it through. I will modify
it to something that does not belong to my httpd server, so I
it?
Thanks, your reply was very quick.
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 9:39 PM, Graham Dumpleton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 03/04/2008, Olexandr Prokhorenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone,
I am working on the input filter which is going to catch on input
requests,
find
On 31/01/2008, Brian Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Graham Dumpleton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 4:29 PM
To: modules-dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Reading of input after headers sent and 100-continue.
The HTTP output
-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-modules-dev/200801.mbox/browser
Graham
On 31/01/2008, Brian Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
Effectively, if a 200 response came back, it seems to suggest
that the client still should send the request body, just that
it 'SHOULD
A question about HTTP output filter and 100-continue.
The HTTP output filter will send a 100 result back to a client when
the first attempt to read input occurs and an Except header with
100-continue was received. Ie., from http_filters.c we have:
/* Since we're about to read data, send
On 18/12/2007, Sander Temme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 17, 2007, at 6:36 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
I would like to know the request type in my module
(handler/filter), is there any way to know that (HTTP
vs HTTPS)?
apr_table_get(r-subprocess_env, HTTPS) might be what you want
The function in server/core.c called for the Timeout directive is:
static const char *set_timeout(cmd_parms *cmd, void *dummy, const char *arg)
{
const char *err = ap_check_cmd_context(cmd,
NOT_IN_DIR_LOC_FILE|NOT_IN_LIMIT);
if (err != NULL) {
return err;
}
their input, or that when they don't they will not generate a response
more than socket buffer size?
Graham
On 17/11/2007, Graham Dumpleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The function in server/core.c called for the Timeout directive is:
static const char *set_timeout(cmd_parms *cmd, void *dummy
On 07/10/2007, Aaron Swartz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
re: http://www.modpython.org/pipermail/mod_python/2007-June/023854.html
I've found a way to make this happen repeatedly. Occurs in both 2.4.2
and 2.5.1. I have a file where every time I read it in, I get it.
If it isn't too large, could you
1 - 100 of 1006 matches
Mail list logo
