flood stuff

2009-10-26 Thread Guy Ferraiolo
This is somewhat of a test for sending to the list and also a reply to Eric 1. Is the username/password getting to the server? You can check your logs or use tcpdump to be sure. 2. Are you trying to randomize this? 3. Are you using a round-robin profile? 4. Include

Re: svn commit: r696047 - in /httpd/flood/trunk: flood_subst_file.c flood_subst_file.h

2008-09-16 Thread Guy Ferraiolo
I'll fix that! And the stub code. WRT to gcc-4.2.3-2ubuntu7 of Sept 3, 2008, I don't have access to that environment but it looks correct to me. I'll be able to get gcc-4.2.3 but only on Mandriva. sorry, Guy On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 14:41 -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > On Tue, Sep 16, 2008

Re: svn commit: r696047 - in /httpd/flood/trunk: flood_subst_file.c flood_subst_file.h

2008-09-16 Thread Guy Ferraiolo
Sorry, that's called 'too much Perl'. Guy On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 16:36 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > > > C++ style comments are not liked by all C compilers. > > I suppose the proper answer then is > > /* //# why mess around, therefore static */ > > ? ;-) Just

Re: svn commit: r696047 - in /httpd/flood/trunk: flood_subst_file.c flood_subst_file.h

2008-09-16 Thread Guy Ferraiolo
I'll fix that. Guy On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 14:40 -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Ruediger Pluem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> + //# why mess around, therefore static > > > > C++ style comments are not liked by all C compilers. > > True, but if you look at the

Re: [flood] [patch] Compilation error fix

2008-09-16 Thread Guy Ferraiolo
This looks reasonable to me but I haven't had a chance to test it myself. Guy On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 11:47 +0300, Ohad Lutzky wrote: > Hello, > > We've been using flood for a project, and couldn't get revision 672044 > to compile in gcc-4.2.3-2ubuntu7 without the attached patch. The error > we go

Re: patch for flood to deal with gcc 4

2008-04-18 Thread Guy Ferraiolo
09:24 +0200, Oden Eriksson wrote: > Den Friday 18 April 2008 00.24.14 skrev Guy Ferraiolo: > > Folks > > > > Here's the patch to get this to compile correctly with gcc 4. It's > > actually only 3 lines. This has been tested with the following > > versions: >

patch for flood to deal with gcc 4

2008-04-17 Thread Guy Ferraiolo
Folks Here's the patch to get this to compile correctly with gcc 4. It's actually only 3 lines. This has been tested with the following versions: gcc version 3.4.6 20060404 (Red Hat 3.4.6-8), (RHEL4 32-bit) gcc version 4.1.1 20070105 (Red Hat 4.1.1-52) (RHEL4 64-bit) Thanks, Guy

Re: [Fwd: Re: more importuning about the flood patch]

2008-04-15 Thread Guy Ferraiolo
rand of > > assignment > > Compiling using GCC 3.3 it built like a charm, only warning me about the > above two lines that it's deprecated. Perhaps someone could fix this? > > - Vincent van Scherpenseel -- Guy Ferraiolo mailto

Re: [Fwd: Re: more importuning about the flood patch]

2008-04-15 Thread Guy Ferraiolo
ing: cast from pointer to integer of different > size > flood_round_robin.c:1236: warning: passing argument 3 of 'apr_file_write' > from > incompatible pointer type > > > > > -- Guy Ferraiolo mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Performance

Re: flood random subst patch

2008-04-14 Thread Guy Ferraiolo
I'm glad flood is regaining attention. It's a great tool > and I find it a pity that the project isn't that active anymore. The > site could use a little updating too: I get 404s for every > svn.apache.org/... link. Also, I believe there's no link back to the > ho

Re: [Fwd: Re: more importuning about the flood patch]

2008-04-14 Thread Guy Ferraiolo
so... > > > Compiling using GCC 3.3 it built like a charm, only warning me about the > > above two lines that it's deprecated. Perhaps someone could fix this? > > > > - Vincent van Scherpenseel > > > -- Guy Ferraiolo

Re: flood random subst patch

2008-03-25 Thread Guy Ferraiolo
It runs fine on one of our x86_64 machines. I'd be glad to take responsibility. Guy On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 15:04 -0400, James M. Leddy wrote: > Guy Ferraiolo wrote: > > Folks > > > > Again, if there's anything I can do to help this along, please let me > >

Re: flood random subst patch

2008-03-25 Thread Guy Ferraiolo
It runs find on one of our x86_64 machines. On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 15:04 -0400, James M. Leddy wrote: > Guy Ferraiolo wrote: > > Folks > > > > Again, if there's anything I can do to help this along, please let me > > know. > > > > Guy > > >

flood random subst patch

2008-03-21 Thread Guy Ferraiolo
Folks Again, if there's anything I can do to help this along, please let me know. Guy -- Guy Ferraiolo mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Performance Measurement & Analysis http://CNET.com CNETtel: 1.908

Re: mod_proxy performance with apache 2.2

2008-03-20 Thread Guy Ferraiolo
27;d like to > support up to 10,000 virtual hosts through this proxy. Is there > something like mod_vhost_alias for proxy for large configurations? > > Is using subdirectories in ProxyPass slowing things down? Really, I'd > just like to forward all requests for anything to t

Re: mod_proxy performance with apache 2.2

2008-03-20 Thread Guy Ferraiolo
xyPass slowing things down? Really, I'd > just like to forward all requests for anything to the origin server IP > and let the origin worry about serving the right vhost's files. > > Thanks, > Skye > -- Guy Ferraiolo mailto:[EMAI

Re: flood random profiletype?

2008-03-17 Thread Guy Ferraiolo
http://${hostname}.example.com/index.html > > but if I use this it works fine: > > http://${hostname}.example.com/ > index.html" /> > > I'm not sure if that's intentional. > > Anyway, seems to work great, thanks again!! Very useful! > >

Re: flood random profiletype?

2008-03-17 Thread Guy Ferraiolo
some reason > even though I'm on a BSD box :P > > Skye > > > > On 17-Mar-08, at 12:43 PM, Guy Ferraiolo wrote: > > > I did it against an svn checkout from that date, or very close to it. > > Can you show the actual errors? or a few? > > > >

Re: flood random profiletype?

2008-03-17 Thread Guy Ferraiolo
unk #3 succeeded at 132 with fuzz 3. > Hunk #4 succeeded at 185 with fuzz 3. > Hunk #5 failed at 238. > Hunk #6 failed at 752. > Hunk #7 succeeded at 874 with fuzz 3. > > Skye > > > On 17-Mar-08, at 12:17 PM, Guy Ferraiolo wrote: > > > That's the easy way. Let

Re: flood random profiletype?

2008-03-17 Thread Guy Ferraiolo
00802.mbox/raw/[EMAIL > PROTECTED]/2 > > Regards, > > Rainer > > > > Skye > > > > > > > > On 17-Mar-08, at 10:54 AM, Guy Ferraiolo wrote: > > > >> It works a bit differently because it does text substitution. That

Re: flood random profiletype?

2008-03-17 Thread Guy Ferraiolo
-0700, Skye Poier Nott wrote: > Even better - very cool patch!! Like many people, I'm interested > primarily in simulating real world traffic and round_robin doesn't > really cut it. > > So is it in SVN or... ? > > Skye > > > > On 17-Mar-08, at 10:5

Re: flood random profiletype?

2008-03-17 Thread Guy Ferraiolo
> Hopefully your patch can do zero padding of random numbers! What's > the url for the patch file? > > Thanks, > Skye > > > On 17-Mar-08, at 10:37 AM, Guy Ferraiolo wrote: > > > Actually, I think my current patch which does randomization on URLs in &

Re: flood random profiletype?

2008-03-17 Thread Guy Ferraiolo
_robin. > > Does anyone have a patch to support random? > > If not, and I write one, would you be interested in the patch? > > Thanks, > Skye > > -- Guy Ferraiolo mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Performance Measurement & Analy

Re: flood patches/mods

2008-03-05 Thread Guy Ferraiolo
I wasn't intending to bug you. I think flood belongs in a separate category because it is not httpd specific. Guy On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 11:31 -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Guy Ferraiolo wrote: > > Unknown. I submitted a patch a while ago and Willam Rowe showed some >

Re: flood patches/mods

2008-03-05 Thread Guy Ferraiolo
month or two but might need to discuss it with > someone to avoid submitting silly patches. > > cheers > John > -- Guy Ferraiolo mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Performance Measurement & Analysis http://CNET.com CNET

Re: more importuning about the flood patch

2008-02-22 Thread Guy Ferraiolo
No problem! On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 12:59 -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Guy Ferraiolo wrote: > > Folks > > > > I think flood is highly useful once the random substitution feature is > > added. If we got that into the code base there might be greater use of >

more importuning about the flood patch

2008-02-22 Thread Guy Ferraiolo
once. If no one cares about this how about just putting it in? I've been working with flood for some time and I do care. Is there anything I can do to get this going? Thanks, Guy -- Guy Ferraiolo mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Performance Measurement

Re: flood reg ex matching problems

2008-02-22 Thread Guy Ferraiolo
any effect on pcre). > > I've had some simple regex's working - eg. if I try > responsetemplate="href="([^"]+)"" it sometimes works. > > Any ideas? > > thanks in advance, > John O'Rourke > -- Guy Ferraiolo

Re: flood random substitution patch

2008-02-14 Thread Guy Ferraiolo
substition file were 'article=10' the URL sent by flood would be http://site.com/query?article=10. Please consider this patch. It makes flood much more usable. If there are any questions, just ask. Guy On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 18:06 -0500, Guy Ferraiolo wrote: > Folks > > Att

Re: Integrity of Apache source code

2007-12-20 Thread Guy Ferraiolo
re > >> digitally signed, > >> but what other procedures are in place? For example, how is code > >> signed-off for > >> inclusion in production releases? > >> > >> I am going to a meeting about this very shortly so would appreciate a > &

flood random substitution patch

2007-12-19 Thread Guy Ferraiolo
e. I am under the impression the patch is in the required format. Let me know of any required changes. I hope this is found useful. Thanks, Guy -- Guy Ferraiolo mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Performance Measurement & Analysis http://CNET

Re: randomized request for apache benchmark

2007-12-19 Thread Guy Ferraiolo
That's what I've got diff -urN, plain text. I'll be sending this on in a few hours. Guy On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 21:06 -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Guy Ferraiolo wrote: > > I'm ready to do this tomorrow and I have asked this question before but > > so

Re: randomized request for apache benchmark

2007-12-18 Thread Guy Ferraiolo
I'm ready to do this tomorrow and I have asked this question before but so long ago I dont' recall. I have a patch which is in the standard format. Do I include it as text in an email or attached? Thanks, Guy On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 11:27 -0500, Guy Ferraiolo wrote: > I have

Re: randomized request for apache benchmark

2007-11-30 Thread Guy Ferraiolo
seek, and > is actively soliciting new ideas and patches? > > Bill -- Guy Ferraiolo mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Performance Measurement & Analysis http://CNET.com CNETtel: 1.908.541.3739 1200 Rout

RE: flood: enhancement - random string substitution in URL

2006-10-04 Thread Guy Ferraiolo
but I think flood is maintained on a different list.. > (it's been a while) > > --Ian > On 05/10/2006, at 10:24 AM, Guy Ferraiolo wrote: > > > Folks > > > > I've developed some additional functionality for flood: random text > > substitution in th

flood: enhancement - random string substitution in URL

2006-10-04 Thread Guy Ferraiolo
e: . That problem has been fixed. There is also no mention of the 'configversion' attribute which the code expects. That has not been fixed. -- Guy Ferraiolo mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Performance Measurement & Analysis http://CNET.com C