I agree I like that better.
Implementation looks more in-depth than the work I've done before, I'll
have a look at it sometime if no one else wishes to take it up.
> Well, that style would be to have an option to ProxyPass that flips
> the worker's preserve host attribute, eg:
>
> ProxyPass /cgi
Sorry, should have read it closer, change my example to :
ProxyPass http://otherserver.com/cgi-bin
>
>
>
> So I just went with that style.
>
>
>
>> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Jeffrey E Burgoyne
>>
>> wrote:
>>> I am doing some
opposed to
/cgi-bin http://otherserver.com/cgi-bin
So I just went with that style.
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Jeffrey E Burgoyne
> wrote:
>> I am doing some work with a large organization that has recently
>> acquired
>> two products that work properly
No pain, I wanted something simple so people can decide if the concept is
worth having. I figured that if I require it, eventually some else
eventually will as well :
ht01b07:~/apacheConfig/tarball/httpd-2.2.14/modules/proxy # diff -u
mod_proxy.h mod_proxy.h.real
--- mod_proxy.h 2011-02-24 07:51:
t;preserve_host == 0) {
ht01b07:~/apacheConfig/tarball/httpd-2.2.14/modules/proxy #
> Quite small, only took a few hours to do. I'll post it tomorrow.
>
> Basically it does the same as PreserveProxyHost except it works on a URL
> basis, not on a per virtual host basis.
>
Quite small, only took a few hours to do. I'll post it tomorrow.
Basically it does the same as PreserveProxyHost except it works on a URL
basis, not on a per virtual host basis.
> On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 14:12:44 -0500
> "Jeffrey E Burgoyne" wrote:
>
>
>> If
I am doing some work with a large organization that has recently acquired
two products that work properly through a reverse proxy system only when
ProxyPreserveHost is set to on.
The organization had issue as they are mandated to have only a single
hostname as a point of entry for their web applic
4 - 1 compression ratio is fine unless you are serving lots of rich
content, which generally will see no performance gain if not reduced
performance.
As pointed out this option is not a one size fits all arrangement.
Shouldn't the default be the best config for everyone based upon the
lowest commo
I am not using the apache balancing, but using a network level load
balancer, but this concept may apply. We append an HTTP header on output
that tells you which machine you were on. As long as each machine has a
separate config file of some sort (in our setup it is http.conf unique per
machine, wi
