MUST
continue using 1.3, you can download it from the archive?
Big +1.
cheers
--
Lars Eilebrecht
l...@eilebrecht.net
configuration?
Please post configuration questions to the httpd user mailing list only.
Thanks
--
Lars Eilebrecht
l...@apache.org
.
Deprecating Limit and LimitExcept can be done in 2.4.x, which means
keeping their functionality intact and warning at startup that the
feature is less good than the new directives.
Roy
Big +1
cheers
--
Lars Eilebrecht
l...@eilebrecht.net
[X] Retire 2.0.x (but accumulate patches/apply_to_2.0.64)
We should announce end of life of 2.0 similar to what we did with 1.3, and
retire it in a few month.
cheers
--
Lars Eilebrecht
l...@eilebrecht.net
Hi Adi,
you should raise questions like this on the httpd user mailing list.
Thanks
Lars
sanoadi wrote:
Hi I am sending the cookie back to web server (appache 2.2) ; it is not
getting recognized.
Cookie is prepared in the below method, where variable cookie used contains
all the
My concern is that people will submit 1.3 bug reports, and get
frustrated when there's no official response. Is there a way we can
keep 1.3 submissions open but make the level of support for 1.3 clear to
bug submitters?
In my opinion we should really close the bug db for
1.3 with a note that
License 2.0, then
it's really the problem of the OpenBSD team, and nothing for us to
fix.
cheers...
--
Lars Eilebrecht
l...@eilebrecht.net
-of-live notification for
httpd 2.0.x with a date 6-12 month in the future.
cheers...
--
Lars Eilebrecht
l...@eilebrecht.net
Dong Wang wrote:
but mod_compress can cache the compressed file, not only the original file.
the mod_cache can only cache the original file, isn't it?
If you combine mod_deflate with mod_cache/mod_cache_disk the compressed
files will be cached.
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht
l...@eilebrecht.net
to
continue including the modules in the httpd package.
+1 on removing mod_imagemap and mod_cern_meta.
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht
l...@apache.org
Paul Querna wrote:
I intend to roll a 2.3 alpha release on Wednesday November 11th.
+1
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht
l...@eilebrecht.net
and then you picked up this thread
last week?
cheers...
--
Lars Eilebrecht
l...@apache.org
Rainer Jung wrote:
I noticed there was still a 2.2.12 in a section heading of the httpd
landing page. I updated in svn:
BTW, the download page actually talks about the release of 2.2.18.
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht
l...@eilebrecht.net
amendment to the patch.
I've seen you added both tests in your patch so we are good anyway.
+1 (and thanks for getting this fixed in trunk, I didn't had the time
to look at this over the weekend).
cheers...
--
Lars Eilebrecht
l...@eilebrecht.net
propose it yet for inclusion in 2.2.12 as I didn't had the
chance to fix this in trunk yet. The code/api in trunk changed
and I don't know if this bug actually exists in trunk.
I don't know if I will have the time to do this over the weekend.
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht
l...@eilebrecht.net
.
However, the following pages should have all information you
need for doing this:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_proxy.html
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_proxy_balancer.html
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht
l...@eilebrecht.net
Torsten Foertsch wrote:
[mod_include DATE_LOCAL bug]
Is this a known bug?
It's probably this one:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39369
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht
l...@eilebrecht.net
a look at this http://www.fmc-modeling.org/projects/apache
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht
l...@apache.org
cases (like 1 out of
10 requests).
BTW, I can reproduce this on Solaris and Linux (worker and prefork)
with 2.2.11. With 2.0 this works fine.
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht
l...@eilebrecht.net
for this.
Thanks Ruediger, that was very helpful. :)
cheers...
--
Lars Eilebrecht
l...@eilebrecht.net
this is the case.
Anyone any idea?
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht
l...@eilebrecht.net
just for mod_disk_cache.
ciao...
+1
Oh, looks like you reported the same bug like 2 years ago, but
it wasn't fixed in trunk as you mentioned in the PR.
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht
l...@eilebrecht.net
-err_headers_out (?), and then ap_cache_cacheable_headers()
gets called with r-headers_out instead of headers_out?
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht
l...@eilebrecht.net
Lars Eilebrecht wrote:
[...]
So it copies r-headers_out to the local headers_out variable, and
removes all unwanted headers. However, then r-err_headers_out
gets merged into headers_out which is then stored in the cache.
Is there a reason why this is done? This could lead to quite a
number
-headers_out and
r-err_headers_out into the local headers_out variable, then
filter the unwanted headers, and store the result.
This seems to work, but maybe I'm missing something.
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht
l...@eilebrecht.net
is really *really* outdated.
IMHO we should consider removing it or at least adding a note that
the stuff is outdated.
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht
l...@eilebrecht.net
for mod_disk_cache.
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht
l...@eilebrecht.net
I'll commit this to trunk
together with an appropriate note in the documentation.
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht
l...@eilebrecht.net
.
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht
l...@eilebrecht.net
Hi,
FYI: I've updated the security_reports.html page to refer
to the central http://www.apache.org/security/ page instead
of pointing people to the security email address directly.
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht
l...@apache.org
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Based on the enthusiasm of the module authors to adopt the AL and offer
the mod_fcgid code to the httpd community, please vote
+/-1
[ ] Accept mod_fcgid into httpd
+1
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht
l...@eilebrecht.net
...
--
Lars Eilebrecht
l...@eilebrecht.net
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.2.11 are available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Your votes please;
+/-1
[ ] Release httpd-2.2.11 as GA
+1, tested on Ubuntu 8 (kernel 2.6.24).
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht
l...@apache.org
Paul Querna wrote:
delete them.
+1
you could say, let it die.
but i prefer, help it die.
I'm really happy to help in this case. :)
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
of another child process once
all threads of the other process are busy. Wouldn't it make more
sense to keep spare threads in all child processes instead of just
one? Especially if the config has low MaxRequestsPerChild limit.
Or am I missing something?
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
3
MaxClients 768
MinSpareThreads 25
MaxSpareThreads 75
ThreadsPerChild 256
MaxRequestsPerChild 200
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
According to Paul:
My proposal is for every 2 months, we do a release of the main stable
branch, which at this time is 2.2.x.
+1 on the concept, but in my opinion 2 month is too short.
3-4 month would be better.
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
http://httpd.apache.org/usersdelist.html (German)
Best Regards
--
Lars Eilebrecht
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FYI: this info came in via the press mailing list ...
http://www.infoworld.com/slideshow/2007/09/114-best_of_open_so-5.html
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
According to Roy:
For standards conformance, I am going to start removing the default
content type settings from trunk tomorrow.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13986
If you have any problems with that, let them be known here.
+1
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht
[EMAIL
to do
something which is stupid and absurd.
*shrug* but as everyone seems to think that this is a good idea,
feel free to ignore my veto.
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
According to Mads:
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 01:30:26PM +0100, Lars Eilebrecht wrote:
I voted -1 at that time which is a veto.
My opinion hasn't changed and I still think that it is a very
stupid idea to add a feature that allows our users to do
something which is stupid and absurd
to customize the Server header by
using mod_security which has a configuration directive for this.
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
don't think that it would go away entirely, because
I assume (based on the questions I've seen) that many people actually
ask about how to change the Server header (and not just about
disabling it).
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht- Reality corrupts.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
/pWert/1393
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht - Out of coffee--error. Programmer halted.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
According to William:
Would like to consolidate the two lists into [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Votes please? I'm calling this issue 12 hours from now.
+1
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht - Great spirits have always encountered violent
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - opposition from mediocre. (Albert
decided to not add any
new features to 1.3).
-0 for adding this to 2.x
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht - Reality does not exist ... yet.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
/apply_to_1.3.31/
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht - Ever notice how fast Windows runs?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Neither did I.
According to Jeffrey:
What is the correct way to start to move forward with this?
Details how code patches should be submitted are described at
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/patches.html
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht - I don't know, I don't care,
[EMAIL PROTECTED
According to Gerardo Reynaga:
Is there a way to pass directives to httpd
once the server is running?
How about using a graceful restart?
Would that be feasible in your case?
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht - Too clever is dumb. (Ogden Nash)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
for it.
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht- Don't use no double negatives, not never.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
without
confguring an ISS server header.
If everyone starts changing the server header to some funny
name or to remove it completely, newer exploit tools won't
bother to check it at all, but just try to exploit the server.
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht - Quoting one is plagiarism
... after some
debugging I found out that this was caused, because the
admin tried to be smart and changed Apache's version number
to 0.9.7. This resulted in some of the appplication's
version dependant functions to fail.
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht - Today is the last day
[EMAIL
According to William A. Rowe, Jr.:
Here is a simple suggestion; does anyone mind if I run CHANGES in 1.3,
2.0 and 2.1 through the following filter?
perl -e while(stdin){s#([^ @]*)@([^ @]*)#$1 $2#g;print $_;}
+1
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht- Never put off until tomorrow what
According to Rich Bowen:
[Remove mod_imap and mod_asis from the default list]
+1
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht- All the simple programs have been
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - written, and all the good names taken.
According to André Malo:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
replacing with amp; in an URL is not a good idea.
sorry, but it is. Not using amp; is wrong.
See: http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/appendix/notes.html#h-B.2.2
Err ... but the links don't work then. (?)
ciao..
--
Lars Eilebrecht
patch.
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht - Quoting one is plagiarism.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Quoting many is research.
to .zh.
Looks like we forgot to make appropriate changes
to the default config. Well, actually I made
those changes, but forgot about httpd.conf.
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
According to Werner Schalk:
for the german speaking people: According
to the website addison-wesley.de there
will be a german (sorry!) book at the
end of this month.
Other books are listed at
http://httpd.apache.org/info/apache_books.html
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht
According to Ravindra Jaju:
How about an extra echo:
if [ x`$aux/getuid.sh` != x0 -a x$port = x ]; then
conf_port=8080
echo Non-root process. Server will run on port $conf_port
fi
+1
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
According to [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Anyone think it is a good idea if I did a
s/@/_at_/g
on the email addresses in the Changes file ?
Won't help that much ... -0.
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht- All the simple programs have been
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - written
According to Murali K. Vemuri:
i wanna add a perl script handler for the apache and i could not
understand from the help files.
This is a developer mailing list.
Please ask your questions on the users mailing list.
http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht
.
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht - Home is where the computer is plugged in.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
According to Dwayne Miller:
BTW, if this is the wrong list, please direct me to the proper one.
http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht- Disc space... the final frontier!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
now these days anyways.
I'd prefer to having an 'official' apache.org location for
all our mail archives.
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht - RFC 527: Beware the ARPANET, my son;
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - The bits that byte, the heads that scratch;
and are intended for use
in documentation and other examples.
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht - I may not be totally perfect,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - but parts of me are excellent.
According to Chuck Murcko:
So what do you think?
Hmm... I'm not sure.
Can you give some examples where this directive will be useful?
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht - The best way to predict the future is to invent it.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Alan Kay
According to Ryan Bloom:
All we are saying, is if you don't specify a
port (i.e. you don't want to use a special port), use the same port that
the original request used.
+1
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht - You might have mail.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
According to Roy T. Fielding:
And, personally, I have always hated the stupid alpha/beta/GA distinction.
Our release process became constipated on the day that was added.
I tend to agree.
And our users get (or area already) confused by this release process.
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht
According to Joshua Slive:
I'm not sure why Ralf did it that way. It seems that HTTPS should simply
be added to the safe list near the top of the file. The revised patch is
below.
+1
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht- Cyberspace: ...the most potent technology
[EMAIL PROTECTED
is cool, but are we going to include mod_auth_ldap
and/or mod_ldap as a standard module in future 2.0 distributions
(e.g. in modules/experimental)?
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht - Real programmers don't need comments
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - ...the code is obvious.
According to Greg Stein:
Why can't we name our damned tarballs and resulting directories like all
other packages out there?
For example: httpd-2.0.31-alpha.tar.gz
unpacks into: ./httpd-2.0.31-alpha/
+1!
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht - Don't hate yourself in the morning
running? Thanks.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is a _developer_ mailing list and _not_ a support forum.
Please see http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for information about
our user discussion list.
Regards...
--
Lars Eilebrecht- To err is human,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]- but I
, e.g., matching on REQUEST_URI.
I tend to be -1 on your patch Ian, because the directive is too
specific. We either need a more generic one or just stick with
the current (or an enhanced) conditional logging functionality.
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht- ...just a roadkill
.
If there are no objections I'll change the Name of
the directive to MaxRequestsPerThread and update the
docs and httpd.conf.
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht - Unix is like Sex: If you don't know it,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - you don't miss is. But if you know
According to William A. Rowe, Jr.:
Isn't it time to drop TransferLog and CookieLog?
+1
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht - Just give me the coffee...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - and no one will get hurt.
) will be transfered to the
ASF account.
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht - Money is the root of all evil!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Send 15$ for more info!
Apache 1.3 branch, on CVS.
+1
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht - Facts are the enemy of truth.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Don Quixote)
78 matches
Mail list logo