Re: buildconf against installed APR

for the benefit (?) of whoever else is reading this thread (if anybody). Graham Leggett wrote: Luc Pardon wrote: Both apr and httpd ship with generic spec files included. The apr spec files are designed so that you can install apr-0.x and apr-1.x side by side without conflicts

Re: [vote] 2.2.0 tarballs

Available from: http://people.apache.org/~pquerna/dev/httpd-2.2.0/ FWIW, the MIME types for the .md5 files seem to be wrong. The .bz2.md5 is served as application/x-tar and .gz.md5 is application/x-gzip. Luc

Re: [pre-release] rpm spec file (was: Re: [pre-release] 2.0.55 *candidate* available for testing)

Graham Leggett wrote: Luc Pardon said: In that case the 2.0 httpd.spec files should either a) not require pre-installed apr packages and build apr as part of the httpd rpm, A definite -1 on this. If this were so, httpd could not coexist cleanly with other packages that depended

[pre-release] rpm spec file (was: Re: [pre-release] 2.0.55 *candidate* available for testing)

. Beyond that, any fix I can offer (e.g. to build separate apr packages) would only be tested on my systems. Luc Pardon

Re: [pre-release] 2.0.55 *candidate* available for testing

probably be able to fix it myself. Luc Pardon Skopos Consulting Belgium

[RFC] Patch for mod_log_config to allow conditioning on status code

contributed patches against mod_log_config waiting for a decision (# 28037, 29449 and 31311). I am willing to ensure compatibility with any or all of them if desired. Thanks for your time, Luc Pardon Skopos Consulting Belgium