" patch (# 25014) also allows conditioning on status
code(s), and there are three other contributed patches against
mod_log_config waiting for a decision (# 28037, 29449 and 31311). I am
willing to ensure compatibility with any or all of them if desired.
Thanks for your time,
Luc Pardon
Skopos Consulting
Belgium
> mod_smtpd_spamd.tar.gz
> This is a module that sends the mail to spamd on the data_post hook.
> Currently this module will bounce mail that is spam if it over the spam
> threshold + reject_level. More features to come like adding headers,
> rewriting subject lines, etc.
Be careful
at the spec file is trying to accomplish (e.g. separate
apr packages), I'd probably be able to fix it myself.
Luc Pardon
Skopos Consulting
Belgium
he
2.0.55 tarball altogether (but that's frozen, right?).
If you leave it in, changing the dependencies to properly require
0.9.7 (or newer?) is a trivial change to build/rpm/httpd.spec.in. So
trivial in fact that I'm willing to provide a patch .
Beyond that, any fix I can offer (e.g. to build separate apr
packages) would only be tested on my systems.
Luc Pardon
Graham Leggett wrote:
>
> Luc Pardon said:
>
> > In that case the 2.0 httpd.spec files should either a) not require
> > pre-installed apr packages and build apr as part of the httpd rpm,
>
> A definite -1 on this. If this were so, httpd could not coexist cleanly
Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 11:38:03AM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
> > Anybody who wants to run the latest version of httpd on their RPM based
> > server,
>
> How many people actually build RPM's is what I'm wondering, given the
> errors that creep in in the releases,
> Available from:
> http://people.apache.org/~pquerna/dev/httpd-2.2.0/
>
FWIW, the MIME types for the .md5 files seem to be wrong.
The .bz2.md5 is served as "application/x-tar" and .gz.md5 is
"application/x-gzip".
Luc
c
file - especially if it comes with the product - should build
everywhere, under any circumstances, not just on the author's machine
(and please don't take this as a personal attack, it is not meant as
one).
Best regards,
Luc Pardon
ts,
if only for the benefit (?) of whoever else is reading this thread (if
anybody).
Graham Leggett wrote:
>
> Luc Pardon wrote:
>
> >> Both apr and httpd ship with generic spec files included. The apr spec
> >> files are designed so that you can install apr-0.x and a